Product comparison · 2 gateways/controllers

Dahua Technology DH-SACG1000 gateway/controller vs TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s

4specifications compared
3differ
1identical
18known for one product only

Key differences

The Dahua Technology DH-SACG1000 gateway/controller has 325 mm more depth than the TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s (423 mm vs 98 mm). The Dahua Technology DH-SACG1000 gateway/controller has 19 mm more height than the TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s (44 mm vs 25 mm). The Dahua Technology DH-SACG1000 gateway/controller has 340 mm more width than the TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s (440 mm vs 100 mm).

Depth
- DH-SACG1000 gateway/controller:423 mm
- Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:98 mm
Height
- DH-SACG1000 gateway/controller:44 mm
- Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:25 mm
Width
- DH-SACG1000 gateway/controller:440 mm
- Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:100 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of DH-SACG1000, OC220
22 specifications	A Dahua Technology DH-SACG1000 gateway/controller Model DH-SACG1000 View product	B TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s Model OC220 View product
Designidentical
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Rack capacityKnown for one	1U	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mounting typeKnown for one	Rack mounting	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Control display unitKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Networkidentical
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10,100,1000 Mbit/s
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Management featuresidentical
Reset buttonKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Softwareidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Windows 7/8/10/11, Vista, XP or MAC OS, NetWare, UNIX or Linux
Weight & dimensions3 differ
DepthDiffers	423 mm	98 mm
HeightDiffers	44 mm	25 mm
WidthDiffers	440 mm	100 mm
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-5 - 50 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-40 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 90%
Featuresidentical
Channels quantityKnown for one	500 channels	Unknown — not stated by the source
Protocolsidentical
Routing protocolsKnown for one	BGP, OSPF, VRRP	Unknown — not stated by the source
Securityidentical
MAC address filteringKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Security algorithmsKnown for one	802.1x RADIUS, SNMP, SNMPv2, SNMPv3, SSH	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	150 W	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More gateways/controllers comparisons

All gateways/controllers comparisons