Product comparison · 2 gateways/controllers

D-Link DWM-3010 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s vs TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s

7specifications compared
5differ
2identical
19known for one product only

Key differences

The D-Link DWM-3010 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s has 1 more Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports than the TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s (3 vs 2). The D-Link DWM-3010 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s has 27 mm more depth than the TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s (125 mm vs 98 mm). The D-Link DWM-3010 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s has 37 mm more height than the TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s (62 mm vs 25 mm). Operating temperature (T-T): -30 - 60 °C on the D-Link DWM-3010 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s, -5 - 50 °C on the TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s.

Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
- DWM-3010 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:3
- Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:2
Depth
- DWM-3010 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:125 mm
- Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:98 mm
Height
- DWM-3010 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:62 mm
- Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:25 mm
Width
- DWM-3010 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:160 mm
- Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:100 mm
Operating temperature (T-T)
- DWM-3010 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:-30 - 60 °C
- Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:-5 - 50 °C

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of DWM-3010, OC220
26 specifications	A D-Link DWM-3010 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s Model DWM-3010 View product	B TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s Model OC220 View product
Designidentical
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Featuresidentical
Antenna typeKnown for one	External	Unknown — not stated by the source
Protocolsidentical
DMZ supportKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Networkidentical
Networking standardsKnown for one	IEEE 802.11a, IEEE 802.11ac, IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11n	Unknown — not stated by the source
Firewall throughputKnown for one	866 Mbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Securityidentical
Security algorithmsKnown for one	SNMP	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
SIM card slotKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers	3	2
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Management featuresidentical
Quality of Service (QoS) supportKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Reset buttonKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Poweridentical
Input currentKnown for one	2.7 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
DC input voltageKnown for one	9 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
DepthDiffers	125 mm	98 mm
HeightDiffers	62 mm	25 mm
WidthDiffers	160 mm	100 mm
WeightKnown for one	1.15 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	-30 - 60 °C	-5 - 50 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-40 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 90%
Performanceidentical
Control display unitKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Softwareidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Windows 7/8/10/11, Vista, XP or MAC OS, NetWare, UNIX or Linux

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More gateways/controllers comparisons

All gateways/controllers comparisons