ATEN VK211 gateway/controller vs TP-Link Omada Hardware Controller

Key differences

The TP-Link Omada Hardware Controller has 8.31 W more power consumption (typical) than the ATEN VK211 gateway/controller (9 W vs 0.69 W). The TP-Link Omada Hardware Controller has 98 mm more depth than the ATEN VK211 gateway/controller (180 mm vs 82 mm). The TP-Link Omada Hardware Controller has 17.8 mm more height than the ATEN VK211 gateway/controller (44 mm vs 26.2 mm). Storage temperature (T-T): -20 - 60 °C on the ATEN VK211 gateway/controller, -40 - 70 °C on the TP-Link Omada Hardware Controller. Operating relative humidity (H-H): 0 - 80% on the ATEN VK211 gateway/controller, 10 - 90% on the TP-Link Omada Hardware Controller.

• Power consumption (typical)
  • VK211 gateway/controller:0.69 W
  • Omada Hardware Controller:9 W
• Depth
  • VK211 gateway/controller:82 mm
  • Omada Hardware Controller:180 mm
• Height
  • VK211 gateway/controller:26.2 mm
  • Omada Hardware Controller:44 mm
• Width
  • VK211 gateway/controller:73 mm
  • Omada Hardware Controller:294 mm
• Storage temperature (T-T)
  • VK211 gateway/controller:-20 - 60 °C
  • Omada Hardware Controller:-40 - 70 °C
• Operating relative humidity (H-H)
  • VK211 gateway/controller:0 - 80%
  • Omada Hardware Controller:10 - 90%