Product comparison · 2 fryers

Electrolux EAF12B Single vs Philips 4000 series NA462/80R1 fryer Double

25specifications compared
12differ
13identical
24known for one product only

Key differences

The Electrolux EAF12B Single has 2 L more capacity than the Philips 4000 series NA462/80R1 fryer Double (12 L vs 10 L). The Philips 4000 series NA462/80R1 fryer Double has 1,050 W more power than the Electrolux EAF12B Single (2750 W vs 1700 W). The Electrolux EAF12B Single has 143 mm more width than the Philips 4000 series NA462/80R1 fryer Double (376 mm vs 233 mm). Construction type: Single on the Electrolux EAF12B Single, Double on the Philips 4000 series NA462/80R1 fryer Double. Product colour: Black on the Electrolux EAF12B Single, Black, Gold on the Philips 4000 series NA462/80R1 fryer Double.

Capacity
- EAF12B Single:12 L
- 4000 series NA462/80R1 fryer Double:10 L
Construction type
- EAF12B Single:Single
- 4000 series NA462/80R1 fryer Double:Double
Product colour
- EAF12B Single:Black
- 4000 series NA462/80R1 fryer Double:Black, Gold
Power
- EAF12B Single:1700 W
- 4000 series NA462/80R1 fryer Double:2750 W
Width
- EAF12B Single:376 mm
- 4000 series NA462/80R1 fryer Double:233 mm
Depth
- EAF12B Single:322 mm
- 4000 series NA462/80R1 fryer Double:469 mm
Height
- EAF12B Single:409 mm
- 4000 series NA462/80R1 fryer Double:399 mm
Weight
- EAF12B Single:6.3 kg
- 4000 series NA462/80R1 fryer Double:8.98 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of EAF12B, NA462/80R1
49 specifications	A Electrolux EAF12B Single Model EAF12B View product	B Philips 4000 series NA462/80R1 fryer Double Model NA462/80R1 View product
Features1 differ
CapacityDiffers	12 L	10 L
Fryer food capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.4 kg
Low-fat frying technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Rapid Air
Number of programsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	6
GrillingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Roasting functionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Temperature (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	200 °C
Temperature (min)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	40 °C
Timer durationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	60 min
Design2 differ
Construction typeDiffers	Single	Double
Product colourDiffers	Black	Black, Gold
MaterialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Plastic, Metal
Cool touch handle(s)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Internal coatingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Ceramic
Cord lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 m
Easy to cleanKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Non-slip feetKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
On/off switchKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Viewing windowKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Indicationidentical
Power LEDKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power1 differ
PowerDiffers	1700 W	2750 W
Auto power offKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Auto power off afterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 min
AC input frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50 Hz
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	376 mm	233 mm
DepthDiffers	322 mm	469 mm
HeightDiffers	409 mm	399 mm
WeightDiffers	6.3 kg	8.98 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	418 mm	275 mm
Package depthDiffers	374 mm	520 mm
Package heightDiffers	425 mm	435 mm
Package weightDiffers	10.4 kg	11.2 kg
Technical detailsidentical
Housing materialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Plastic
Other featuresidentical
Country of originKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	China
Warranty periodKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2 year(s)
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	1700 W	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More fryer comparisons

All fryer comparisons