Product comparison · 2 fridge-freezers

Whirlpool BSNF 8432 IX vs Whirlpool WTV 4236 TS

30specifications compared
16differ
14identical
31known for one product only

Key differences

Total net capacity
- BSNF 8432 IX:319 L
- WTV 4236 TS:430 L
Climate class
- BSNF 8432 IX:SN-T
- WTV 4236 TS:N-ST
Noise level
- BSNF 8432 IX:42 dB
- WTV 4236 TS:39 dB
Fridge net capacity
- BSNF 8432 IX:222 L
- WTV 4236 TS:299 L
Freezer position
- BSNF 8432 IX:Bottom-placed
- WTV 4236 TS:Top-placed
Freezer net capacity
- BSNF 8432 IX:97 L
- WTV 4236 TS:131 L
Freezing capacity
- BSNF 8432 IX:4 kg/24h
- WTV 4236 TS:5.5 kg/24h
Storage time during power failure
- BSNF 8432 IX:16 h
- WTV 4236 TS:36 h

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of BSNF 8432 IX, WTV 4236 TS
61 specifications	A Whirlpool BSNF 8432 IX View product	B Whirlpool WTV 4236 TS View product
Designidentical
Control typeKnown for one	Touch	Unknown — not stated by the source
Built-in capabilityKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Reversible doorsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Built-in displayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Refrigerating mediumKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	R600A
Performance3 differ
Total net capacityDiffers	319 L	430 L
Total gross capacityKnown for one	356 L	Unknown — not stated by the source
Climate classDiffers	SN-T	N-ST
Noise levelDiffers	42 dB	39 dB
CertificationKnown for one	2010/30/EC	Unknown — not stated by the source
Water dispenserKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Fridge1 differ
Fridge net capacityDiffers	222 L	299 L
Cooling systemKnown for one	Ventilated	Unknown — not stated by the source
Fridge gross capacityKnown for one	234 L	Unknown — not stated by the source
No Frost (fridge)Known for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Multi-Airflow system (fridge)Known for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Egg trayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Bottle rackKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Anti-bacterial coatingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Freezer5 differ
Freezer positionDiffers	Bottom-placed	Top-placed
Freezer net capacityDiffers	97 L	131 L
Freezer gross capacityKnown for one	122 L	Unknown — not stated by the source
Freezing capacityDiffers	4 kg/24h	5.5 kg/24h
Storage time during power failureDiffers	16 h	36 h
Automatic defrost (freezer)Known for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Freezer number of shelves/basketsDiffers	3	2
Fast freeze functionKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
No Frost (freezer)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Fresh zone1 differ
Fresh zone compartmentDiffers	No	Yes
Ergonomicsidentical
Cord lengthKnown for one	2 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)Differs	A++	A+
Annual energy consumptionDiffers	244 kWh	349 kWh
Connected loadKnown for one	150 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageKnown for one	220 - 240 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC input frequencyKnown for one	50 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
CurrentKnown for one	10 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power sourceKnown for one	Electric	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy usageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.96 kWh/24h
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	595 mm	710 mm
DepthDiffers	663 mm	750 mm
HeightDiffers	1888 mm	1750 mm
WeightDiffers	67 kg	68 kg
Other featuresidentical
Original model nameKnown for one	BSNF 8432 IX	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	750 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	810 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1810 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	70 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More fridge-freezer comparisons

All fridge-freezer comparisons