Product comparison · 2 fridge-freezers

Samsung RT59QBSL Freestanding Stainless steel vs Whirlpool WBE3325 NF IX AQUA

31specifications compared
16differ
15identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

Reversible doors
- RT59QBSL Freestanding Stainless steel:No
- WBE3325 NF IX AQUA:Yes
Built-in display
- RT59QBSL Freestanding Stainless steel:Yes
- WBE3325 NF IX AQUA:LED
Total gross capacity
- RT59QBSL Freestanding Stainless steel:412 L
- WBE3325 NF IX AQUA:352 L
Climate class
- RT59QBSL Freestanding Stainless steel:SN-T
- WBE3325 NF IX AQUA:N-T
Freezer position
- RT59QBSL Freestanding Stainless steel:Top-placed
- WBE3325 NF IX AQUA:Bottom-placed
Freezing capacity
- RT59QBSL Freestanding Stainless steel:10 kg/24h
- WBE3325 NF IX AQUA:4.5 kg/24h
Freezer number of shelves/baskets
- RT59QBSL Freestanding Stainless steel:1
- WBE3325 NF IX AQUA:3
Fast freeze function
- RT59QBSL Freestanding Stainless steel:Yes
- WBE3325 NF IX AQUA:No

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of RT59QBSL, WBE3325 NF IX AQUA
52 specifications	A Samsung RT59QBSL Freestanding Stainless steel Model RT59QBSL View product	B Whirlpool WBE3325 NF IX AQUA View product
Design2 differ
Appliance placement	Freestanding	Freestanding
Product colour	Stainless steel	Stainless steel
Door hinge	Right	Right
Reversible doorsDiffers	No	Yes
Child lockKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Control typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Buttons
Built-in displayDiffers	Yes	LED
Number of compressors	1	1
Performance2 differ
Total net capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	320 L
Total gross capacityDiffers	412 L	352 L
Climate classDiffers	SN-T	N-T
Noise level	42 dB	42 dB
Fridgeidentical
Fridge net capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	223 L
Fridge gross capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	227 L
Fridge interior light	Yes	Yes
Fridge number of shelves/baskets	4	4
Egg tray	Yes	Yes
Bottle rack	Yes	Yes
Number of vegetable drawersKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Freezer4 differ
Freezer positionDiffers	Top-placed	Bottom-placed
Freezer net capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	97 L
Freezer gross capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	125 L
Freezing capacityDiffers	10 kg/24h	4.5 kg/24h
Storage time during power failure	12 h	12 h
Star rating	4*	4*
Freezer number of shelves/basketsDiffers	1	3
Fast freeze functionDiffers	Yes	No
Ice cube trayKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Fresh zone1 differ
Fresh zone compartmentDiffers	Yes	No
Ergonomics1 differ
Door open alarmDiffers	Yes	No
Adjustable feetKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Cord lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.7 m
Power1 differ
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)	A+	A+
Annual energy consumptionDiffers	408 kWh	327 kWh
Connected loadKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	150 W
Energy usageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.89 kWh/24h
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	748 mm	595 mm
DepthDiffers	772 mm	640 mm
HeightDiffers	1741 mm	1875 mm
WeightDiffers	88 kg	65 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	640 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	710 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1945 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	67 kg
Other features1 differ
No Frost system	Yes	Yes
Defrost functionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Multi-airflow systemDiffers	Yes	No
Form factor	Upright	Upright
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Temperature
Door type	Double	Double
Anti-bacterial functionKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Built-in freezerKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More fridge-freezer comparisons

All fridge-freezer comparisons