Product comparison · 2 fridge-freezers

Gorenje RK 6201 UX/2 vs Whirlpool WTE3113 TS

27specifications compared
15differ
12identical
24known for one product only

Key differences

Total net capacity
- RK 6201 UX/2:331 L
- WTE3113 TS:316 L
Climate class
- RK 6201 UX/2:SN-T
- WTE3113 TS:N-ST
Noise level
- RK 6201 UX/2:40 dB
- WTE3113 TS:39 dB
Fridge net capacity
- RK 6201 UX/2:245 L
- WTE3113 TS:228 L
Fridge number of shelves/baskets
- RK 6201 UX/2:5
- WTE3113 TS:4
Number of vegetable drawers
- RK 6201 UX/2:2
- WTE3113 TS:1
Freezer position
- RK 6201 UX/2:Bottom-placed
- WTE3113 TS:Top-placed
Freezer net capacity
- RK 6201 UX/2:86 L
- WTE3113 TS:88 L

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of RK 6201 UX/2, WTE3113 TS
51 specifications	A Gorenje RK 6201 UX/2 View product	B Whirlpool WTE3113 TS View product
Designidentical
Door hingeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Right
Built-in displayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Number of compressorsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Performance3 differ
Total net capacityDiffers	331 L	316 L
Total gross capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	320 L
Climate classDiffers	SN-T	N-ST
Noise levelDiffers	40 dB	39 dB
Air filterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Fridge3 differ
Fridge net capacityDiffers	245 L	228 L
Fridge gross capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	232 L
Multi-Airflow system (fridge)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Fridge number of shelves/basketsDiffers	5	4
Number of vegetable drawersDiffers	2	1
Egg trayKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Freezer4 differ
Freezer positionDiffers	Bottom-placed	Top-placed
Freezer net capacityDiffers	86 L	88 L
Freezer gross capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	88 L
Freezing capacityDiffers	10 kg/24h	4 kg/24h
Storage time during power failureDiffers	18 h	30 h
Star ratingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4*
Fast freeze functionKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ice cube trayKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Fresh zoneidentical
Fresh zone compartmentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Ergonomicsidentical
Cord lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.7 m
Power2 differ
Annual energy consumptionDiffers	333 kWh	288 kWh
Connected loadKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	150 W
CurrentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 A
Energy usageDiffers	0.91 kWh/24h	0.78 kWh/24h
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	600 mm	595 mm
HeightDiffers	2000 mm	1725 mm
WeightDiffers	91.4 kg	54 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	640 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	705 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1775 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	56 kg
Other featuresidentical
No Frost systemKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
ThermostatKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Anti-bacterial functionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Gross weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	56 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More fridge-freezer comparisons

All fridge-freezer comparisons