Product comparison · 2 fridge-freezers

Candy CKBC 3350 E vs Samsung RT62ZAMT 494 L Silver

12specifications compared
9differ
3identical
34known for one product only

Key differences

Product colour
- CKBC 3350 E:White
- RT62ZAMT 494 L Silver:Silver
Total net capacity
- CKBC 3350 E:275 L
- RT62ZAMT 494 L Silver:494 L
Noise level
- CKBC 3350 E:42 dB
- RT62ZAMT 494 L Silver:45 dB
Fridge net capacity
- CKBC 3350 E:216 L
- RT62ZAMT 494 L Silver:368 L
Freezer net capacity
- CKBC 3350 E:58 L
- RT62ZAMT 494 L Silver:126 L
Annual energy consumption
- CKBC 3350 E:273 kWh
- RT62ZAMT 494 L Silver:395 kWh
Width
- CKBC 3350 E:540 mm
- RT62ZAMT 494 L Silver:772 mm
Weight
- CKBC 3350 E:60 kg
- RT62ZAMT 494 L Silver:91 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CKBC 3350 E, RT62ZAMT
46 specifications	A Candy CKBC 3350 E View product	B Samsung RT62ZAMT 494 L Silver Model RT62ZAMT View product
Design1 differ
Appliance placementKnown for one	Built-in	Unknown — not stated by the source
Product colourDiffers	White	Silver
Custom panel-readyKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Reversible doorsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Child lockKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Built-in displayKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performance2 differ
Total net capacityDiffers	275 L	494 L
Total gross capacityKnown for one	292 L	Unknown — not stated by the source
Climate classKnown for one	ST	Unknown — not stated by the source
Minimum operating temperatureKnown for one	18 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum operating temperatureKnown for one	38 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Noise levelDiffers	42 dB	45 dB
Fridge1 differ
Fridge net capacityDiffers	216 L	368 L
Fridge gross capacityKnown for one	218 L	Unknown — not stated by the source
Fridge interior lightKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
No Frost (fridge)Known for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Multi-Airflow system (fridge)Known for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Fridge number of shelves/basketsKnown for one	5	Unknown — not stated by the source
Fridge door balconiesKnown for one	4	Unknown — not stated by the source
Freezer1 differ
Freezer positionKnown for one	Bottom-placed	Unknown — not stated by the source
Freezer net capacityDiffers	58 L	126 L
Freezer gross capacityKnown for one	75 L	Unknown — not stated by the source
Freezing capacityKnown for one	3 kg/24h	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage time during power failureKnown for one	16 h	Unknown — not stated by the source
Star ratingKnown for one	4*	Unknown — not stated by the source
No Frost (freezer)Known for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Freezer number of shelves/basketsKnown for one	3	Unknown — not stated by the source
Freezer interior lightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Fresh zoneidentical
Fresh zone compartmentKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Annual energy consumptionDiffers	273 kWh	395 kWh
Connected loadKnown for one	140 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageKnown for one	220 - 240 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
CurrentKnown for one	10 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy usageKnown for one	0.747 kWh/24h	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WidthDiffers	540 mm	772 mm
DepthKnown for one	540 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	1850 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers	60 kg	91 kg
Depth without handleKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	7.35 cm
Packaging data1 differ
Package weightDiffers	64 kg	91 kg
Other featuresidentical
No Frost systemKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Multi-airflow systemKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Total capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	368 L

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More fridge-freezer comparisons

All fridge-freezer comparisons