Product comparison · 2 freezers

Whirlpool AFG 5167-C vs Whirlpool AFG 5227-L

26specifications compared
9differ
17identical
3known for one product only

Key differences

Freezer net capacity
- AFG 5167-C:138 L
- AFG 5227-L:212 L
Freezer gross capacity
- AFG 5167-C:141 L
- AFG 5227-L:215 L
Freezing capacity
- AFG 5167-C:11 kg/24h
- AFG 5227-L:14 kg/24h
Storage time during power failure
- AFG 5167-C:30 h
- AFG 5227-L:34 h
Energy usage
- AFG 5167-C:0.77 kWh/24h
- AFG 5227-L:0.94 kWh/24h
Annual energy consumption
- AFG 5167-C:281 kWh
- AFG 5227-L:343 kWh
Width
- AFG 5167-C:570 mm
- AFG 5227-L:810 mm
Weight
- AFG 5167-C:28 kg
- AFG 5227-L:35 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of AFG 5167-C, AFG 5227-L
29 specifications	A Whirlpool AFG 5167-C View product	B Whirlpool AFG 5227-L View product
Performance4 differ
Freezer net capacityDiffers	138 L	212 L
Freezer gross capacityDiffers	141 L	215 L
Freezing capacityDiffers	11 kg/24h	14 kg/24h
Storage time during power failureDiffers	30 h	34 h
Ergonomicsidentical
Interior lightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
LockingKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Energy usageDiffers	0.77 kWh/24h	0.94 kWh/24h
Annual energy consumptionDiffers	281 kWh	343 kWh
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WidthDiffers	570 mm	810 mm
WeightDiffers	28 kg	35 kg
Packaging data1 differ
Package weightDiffers	30 kg	37 kg
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	ENERGY STAR

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More freezer comparisons

All freezer comparisons