Product comparison · 2 freezers

Candy CCTUS 542XH vs Hotpoint UPAH 1832 F

Key differences

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CCTUS 542XH, UPAH 1832 F
25 specifications	A Candy CCTUS 542XH View product	B Hotpoint UPAH 1832 F View product
Designidentical
Door hingeKnown for one	Right	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performance4 differ
Freezer net capacityDiffers	82 L	260 L
Storage time during power failureDiffers	16 h	15 h
Climate classDiffers	ST	SN-T
Noise emission classKnown for one	C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Noise levelDiffers	43 dB	45 dB
Freezer gross capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	261 L
Freezing capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16 kg/24h
No Frost systemKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power1 differ
Energy efficiency classKnown for one	F	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy efficiency scaleKnown for one	A to G	Unknown — not stated by the source
Connected loadKnown for one	1000 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy usageKnown for one	0.482 kWh/24h	Unknown — not stated by the source
Annual energy consumptionDiffers	208 kWh	247.11 kWh
CurrentKnown for one	10 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	A++
Weight & dimensions4 differ
DepthDiffers	580 mm	645 mm
HeightDiffers	850 mm	1855 mm
WidthDiffers	550 mm	595 mm
WeightDiffers	33 kg	81 kg
Packaging data1 differ
Package weightDiffers	35 kg	89 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.