Product comparison · 2 freezers

AEG Arctis 63270 GT vs Beko FCC 102

Add a product
  • 9specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 3identical
  • 10known for one product only

Key differences

  • Freezer net capacity
    • Arctis 63270 GT:255 L
    • FCC 102:102 L
  • Freezing capacity
    • Arctis 63270 GT:27 kg/24h
    • FCC 102:5.5 kg/24h
  • Storage time during power failure
    • Arctis 63270 GT:50 h
    • FCC 102:23 h
  • Annual energy consumption
    • Arctis 63270 GT:176 kWh
    • FCC 102:204 kWh
  • Depth
    • Arctis 63270 GT:660 mm
    • FCC 102:504 mm
  • Height
    • Arctis 63270 GT:870 mm
    • FCC 102:830 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of Arctis 63270 GT, FCC 102
19 specifications
Designidentical
Freezer number of shelves/basketsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Performance3 differ
Freezer net capacityDiffers255 L102 L
Freezer gross capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source108 L
Freezing capacityDiffers27 kg/24h5.5 kg/24h
Storage time during power failureDiffers50 h23 h
Star ratingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4*
Noise levelKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source41 dB
Fast freeze functionKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Annual energy consumptionDiffers176 kWh204 kWh
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)Known for oneA++Unknown — not stated by the source
Connected loadKnown for one100 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions2 differ
DepthDiffers660 mm504 mm
HeightDiffers870 mm830 mm
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source616 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source33 kg
Ergonomicsidentical
Cord lengthKnown for one1.7 mUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More freezer comparisons

All freezer comparisons