Product comparison · 2 food processors

Moulinex Double Force FP8318F0 food processor vs WMF KITCHENminis 0416680001 food processor

Add a product
  • 8specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 4identical
  • 34known for one product only

Key differences

The WMF KITCHENminis 0416680001 food processor has 6 more speeds than the Moulinex Double Force FP8318F0 food processor (8 vs 2). The Moulinex Double Force FP8318F0 food processor has 570 W more power than the WMF KITCHENminis 0416680001 food processor (1000 W vs 430 W). Only the WMF KITCHENminis 0416680001 food processor has built-in display. Product colour: Black on the Moulinex Double Force FP8318F0 food processor, Grey, Stainless steel, White on the WMF KITCHENminis 0416680001 food processor.

  • Product colour
    • Double Force FP8318F0 food processor:Black
    • KITCHENminis 0416680001 food processor:Grey, Stainless steel, White
  • Number of speeds
    • Double Force FP8318F0 food processor:2
    • KITCHENminis 0416680001 food processor:8
  • Built-in display
    • Double Force FP8318F0 food processor:No
    • KITCHENminis 0416680001 food processor:Yes
  • Power
    • Double Force FP8318F0 food processor:1000 W
    • KITCHENminis 0416680001 food processor:430 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of FP8318F0, 0416680001
42 specifications
Features2 differ
Product colourDiffersBlackGrey, Stainless steel, White
Pulse functionKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of speedsDiffers28
Built-in scalesKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Citrus pressKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Blender attachmentKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Coffee grindingKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Meat mincerKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Mixer functionsKnown for oneBlend, Chop, Cutting, Knead, MixingUnknown — not stated by the source
Kneading functionKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Dishwasher-proof partsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Easy to cleanKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Handle(s)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
On/off switchKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Variable speedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
QuantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCE
Display1 differ
Built-in displayDiffersNoYes
TimerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Materialidentical
Bowl materialKnown for onePlasticUnknown — not stated by the source
Housing materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePlastic, Stainless steel, Tritan
Power1 differ
PowerDiffers1000 W430 W
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for one5.86 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source350 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source549 mm
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source227 mm
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one278 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one470 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one461 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one7.8 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Number of slicing discs includedKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Pasta makerKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
BeatersKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Bowl includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Bowls includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMixing
Mixing toolKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
WhiskKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Other featuresidentical
Country of originKnown for oneChinaUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More food processor comparisons

All food processor comparisons