Product comparison · 2 food processors

KitchenAid 5KFP0718EWH food processor vs Philips 3000 series HR7304/91 food processor

19specifications compared
11differ
8identical
20known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips 3000 series HR7304/91 food processor has 0.3 L more bowl capacity than the KitchenAid 5KFP0718EWH food processor (2 L vs 1.7 L). The KitchenAid 5KFP0718EWH food processor has 1 more speeds than the Philips 3000 series HR7304/91 food processor (3 vs 2). The KitchenAid 5KFP0718EWH food processor has 0.1 m more cord length than the Philips 3000 series HR7304/91 food processor (0.9 m vs 0.8 m). Only the Philips 3000 series HR7304/91 food processor has variable speed. Only the Philips 3000 series HR7304/91 food processor has citrus press.

Bowl capacity
- 5KFP0718EWH food processor:1.7 L
- 3000 series HR7304/91 food processor:2 L
Product colour
- 5KFP0718EWH food processor:White
- 3000 series HR7304/91 food processor:Black
Variable speed
- 5KFP0718EWH food processor:No
- 3000 series HR7304/91 food processor:Yes
Number of speeds
- 5KFP0718EWH food processor:3
- 3000 series HR7304/91 food processor:2
Citrus press
- 5KFP0718EWH food processor:No
- 3000 series HR7304/91 food processor:Yes
Cord length
- 5KFP0718EWH food processor:0.9 m
- 3000 series HR7304/91 food processor:0.8 m
Power
- 5KFP0718EWH food processor:300 W
- 3000 series HR7304/91 food processor:1000 W
Depth
- 5KFP0718EWH food processor:195 mm
- 3000 series HR7304/91 food processor:212 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 5KFP0718EWH, HR7304/91
39 specifications	A KitchenAid 5KFP0718EWH food processor Model 5KFP0718EWH View product	B Philips 3000 series HR7304/91 food processor Model HR7304/91 View product
Features6 differ
Bowl capacityDiffers	1.7 L	2 L
Product colourDiffers	White	Black
Variable speedDiffers	No	Yes
Pulse function	Yes	Yes
Control typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Rotary
Number of speedsDiffers	3	2
Built-in scales	No	No
Citrus pressDiffers	No	Yes
Meat mincer	No	No
Kneading function	No	No
Interchangeable bladesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Cord lengthDiffers	0.9 m	0.8 m
Dishwasher-proof parts	Yes	Yes
Non-slip feetKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Rotational speed (min)Known for one	750 RPM	Unknown — not stated by the source
Rotational speed (max)Known for one	2800 RPM	Unknown — not stated by the source
Coffee grindingKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Displayidentical
Built-in display	No	No
Materialidentical
Housing material	Plastic	Plastic
Material jar(s)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	SAN
Power1 differ
PowerDiffers	300 W	1000 W
AC input frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50-60 Hz
AC input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	110 V
Weight & dimensions4 differ
DepthDiffers	195 mm	212 mm
HeightDiffers	390 mm	327 mm
WidthDiffers	195 mm	19.4 mm
WeightDiffers	2.9 kg	1.82 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	255 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	377 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	393 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4.01 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Grating disc includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Slicing disc includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Dough toolKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Pasta makerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Technical detailsidentical
Dangerous goodsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Other featuresidentical
Doesn't containKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Bisphenol A (BPA)
Warranty period	2 year(s)	2 year(s)
Country of originKnown for one	China	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More food processor comparisons

All food processor comparisons