Product comparison · 2 food processors

Kenwood KWL90.164SI food processor vs MEDION LIFE 3-in-1

Add a product
  • 15specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 10identical
  • 31known for one product only

Key differences

The Kenwood KWL90.164SI food processor has 2 L more bowl capacity than the MEDION LIFE 3-in-1 (7 L vs 5 L). The Kenwood KWL90.164SI food processor has 5 more speeds than the MEDION LIFE 3-in-1 (13 vs 8). The Kenwood KWL90.164SI food processor has 200 W more power than the MEDION LIFE 3-in-1 (1400 W vs 1200 W). Product colour: Silver on the Kenwood KWL90.164SI food processor, Black on the MEDION LIFE 3-in-1. Housing material: Metal on the Kenwood KWL90.164SI food processor, Plastic, Stainless steel on the MEDION LIFE 3-in-1.

  • Bowl capacity
    • KWL90.164SI food processor:7 L
    • LIFE 3-in-1:5 L
  • Product colour
    • KWL90.164SI food processor:Silver
    • LIFE 3-in-1:Black
  • Number of speeds
    • KWL90.164SI food processor:13
    • LIFE 3-in-1:8
  • Housing material
    • KWL90.164SI food processor:Metal
    • LIFE 3-in-1:Plastic, Stainless steel
  • Power
    • KWL90.164SI food processor:1400 W
    • LIFE 3-in-1:1200 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of KWL90.164SI, LIFE 3-in-1
46 specifications
Features3 differ
Bowl capacityDiffers7 L5 L
Product colourDiffersSilverBlack
Variable speedYesYes
Planetary rotationKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Pulse functionYesYes
Control typeKnown for oneRotaryUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of speedsDiffers138
Meat mincerYesYes
Interchangeable bladesKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Cord storageKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Dishwasher-proof partsYesYes
On/off switchKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
QuantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Bowl volume capacity liquidKnown for one5 LUnknown — not stated by the source
Built-in scalesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Citrus pressKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Blender attachmentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Blender bowl capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.5 L
Mixer functionsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMixing, Knead, Stirring, Blend
Kneading functionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Cord lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 m
Non-slip feetKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Displayidentical
Built-in displayYesYes
Material1 differ
Housing materialDiffersMetalPlastic, Stainless steel
Bowl materialStainless steelStainless steel
Material jar(s)Known for oneStainless steelUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
PowerDiffers1400 W1200 W
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one350 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one485 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one490 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one14.4 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Number of accessories includedKnown for one8 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Balloon beaterKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Bowl includedYesYes
Bowls includedKnown for oneMixingUnknown — not stated by the source
Dough hooksYesYes
Kneading toolKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Pasta makerKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
SpatulaKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Splash guard includedYesYes
WhiskYesYes
BeatersKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Weight & dimensionsidentical
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source237 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source354 mm
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source442 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4.53 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More food processor comparisons

All food processor comparisons