Product comparison · 2 food processors

Kenwood KHC30.070GY food processor vs MEDION 1892504 food processor

14specifications compared
9differ
5identical
26known for one product only

Key differences

The MEDION 1892504 food processor has 0.7 L more bowl capacity than the Kenwood KHC30.070GY food processor (5 L vs 4.3 L). The MEDION 1892504 food processor has 1 more speeds than the Kenwood KHC30.070GY food processor (8 vs 7). The MEDION 1892504 food processor has 200 W more power than the Kenwood KHC30.070GY food processor (1200 W vs 1000 W). Only the MEDION 1892504 food processor has built-in display. Product colour: Stainless steel, Grey on the Kenwood KHC30.070GY food processor, Black on the MEDION 1892504 food processor.

Bowl capacity
- KHC30.070GY food processor:4.3 L
- 1892504 food processor:5 L
Product colour
- KHC30.070GY food processor:Stainless steel, Grey
- 1892504 food processor:Black
Number of speeds
- KHC30.070GY food processor:7
- 1892504 food processor:8
Built-in display
- KHC30.070GY food processor:No
- 1892504 food processor:Yes
Power
- KHC30.070GY food processor:1000 W
- 1892504 food processor:1200 W
Depth
- KHC30.070GY food processor:336 mm
- 1892504 food processor:230 mm
Height
- KHC30.070GY food processor:294 mm
- 1892504 food processor:354 mm
Width
- KHC30.070GY food processor:262 mm
- 1892504 food processor:390 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of KHC30.070GY, 1892504
40 specifications	A Kenwood KHC30.070GY food processor Model KHC30.070GY View product	B MEDION 1892504 food processor Model 1892504 View product
Features3 differ
Bowl capacityDiffers	4.3 L	5 L
Product colourDiffers	Stainless steel, Grey	Black
Control typeKnown for one	Rotary	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of speedsDiffers	7	8
Built-in scalesKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Citrus pressKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Blender attachmentKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Blender bowl capacityKnown for one	1.5 L	Unknown — not stated by the source
Coffee grindingKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mixer functionsKnown for one	Mixing, Blend, Knead, Grind, Chop	Unknown — not stated by the source
Bowl capacity flourKnown for one	1 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Chopper bowl capacityKnown for one	2.1 L	Unknown — not stated by the source
Stainless steel blade includedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dishwasher-proof partsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Non-slip feetKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Display1 differ
Built-in displayDiffers	No	Yes
Materialidentical
Blade materialKnown for one	Stainless steel	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
PowerDiffers	1000 W	1200 W
Weight & dimensions4 differ
DepthDiffers	336 mm	230 mm
HeightDiffers	294 mm	354 mm
WidthDiffers	262 mm	390 mm
WeightDiffers	7.39 kg	4.59 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	430 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	510 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	365 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	10.6 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Grating disc includedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of grating discs includedKnown for one	3	Unknown — not stated by the source
Blender includedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dough hooksKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Measuring cupKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of slicing discs includedKnown for one	3	Unknown — not stated by the source
Pasta makerKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Splash guard includedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
WhiskKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More food processor comparisons

All food processor comparisons