Product comparison · 2 food processors

Kenwood FP190 food processor vs Philips Viva Collection HR7762/91 Food processor

9specifications compared
6differ
3identical
33known for one product only

Key differences

Bowl capacity
- FP190 food processor:1.4 L
- Viva Collection HR7762/91 Food processor:2 L
Product colour
- FP190 food processor:White
- Viva Collection HR7762/91 Food processor:Black
Power
- FP190 food processor:600 W
- Viva Collection HR7762/91 Food processor:750 W
Depth
- FP190 food processor:150 mm
- Viva Collection HR7762/91 Food processor:210 mm
Height
- FP190 food processor:175 mm
- Viva Collection HR7762/91 Food processor:368 mm
Width
- FP190 food processor:275 mm
- Viva Collection HR7762/91 Food processor:210 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of FP190, HR7762/91
42 specifications	A Kenwood FP190 food processor Model FP190 View product	B Philips Viva Collection HR7762/91 Food processor Model HR7762/91 View product
Features2 differ
Bowl capacityDiffers	1.4 L	2 L
Product colourDiffers	White	Black
Cord lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 m
Bowl capacity flourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	500 g
Chopper bowl capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.25 L
Bowl rotational speed (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1900 RPM
Bowl volume capacity liquidKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.2 L
Capacity jarKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.75 L
Dough bowl weight capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	830 kg
Control typeKnown for one	Rotary	Unknown — not stated by the source
Citrus pressKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Blender bowl capacityKnown for one	1 L	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cord storageKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dishwasher proofKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Stainless steel blade includedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
PowerDiffers	600 W	750 W
Power consumption (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	750 W
AC input frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50-60 Hz
AC input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	220-240 V
Weight & dimensions3 differ
DepthDiffers	150 mm	210 mm
HeightDiffers	175 mm	368 mm
WidthDiffers	275 mm	210 mm
WeightKnown for one	2.17 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Emulsifying discKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Kneading toolKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
SpatulaKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Packaging contentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Blade unit S-blade; Coarse shredding tool; Coarse slicing tool; Fine shredding tool; Fine slicing tool; French-fry tool; Granulating tool; Julienne tool; Kneading tool; Mill; Reversible disc
Fine metal grinding disc (4mm)Known for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
WhiskKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Dangerous goodsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Packaging recyclability rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	90%
User manual recycled paperKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Blender rotational speed (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	21000 RPM
Bowl volume capacity dryKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.2 L
Other featuresidentical
Warranty periodKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2 year(s)
FunctionsKnown for one	16	Unknown — not stated by the source
Materialidentical
Housing materialKnown for one	Plastic	Unknown — not stated by the source
Bowl materialKnown for one	Plastic	Unknown — not stated by the source
Material knifeKnown for one	Stainless steel	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More food processor comparisons

All food processor comparisons