Product comparison · 2 food processors

Kenwood Classic Chef vs Philips HR1055/90 Jamie Oliver Cutting tower

9specifications compared
8differ
1identical
20known for one product only

Key differences

Product colour
- Classic Chef:White
- HR1055/90 Jamie Oliver Cutting tower:Black
Number of speeds
- Classic Chef:8
- HR1055/90 Jamie Oliver Cutting tower:2
Material
- Classic Chef:Metal, Plastic
- HR1055/90 Jamie Oliver Cutting tower:Plastic
Power
- Classic Chef:800 W
- HR1055/90 Jamie Oliver Cutting tower:200 W
Depth
- Classic Chef:390 mm
- HR1055/90 Jamie Oliver Cutting tower:408 mm
Height
- Classic Chef:290 mm
- HR1055/90 Jamie Oliver Cutting tower:240 mm
Width
- Classic Chef:235 mm
- HR1055/90 Jamie Oliver Cutting tower:192 mm
Weight
- Classic Chef:6.49 kg
- HR1055/90 Jamie Oliver Cutting tower:1.92 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Classic Chef, HR1055/90
29 specifications	A Kenwood Classic Chef View product	B Philips HR1055/90 Jamie Oliver Cutting tower Model HR1055/90 View product
Features2 differ
Bowl capacityKnown for one	4.6 L	Unknown — not stated by the source
Product colourDiffers	White	Black
Variable speedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of speedsDiffers	8	2
BlenderKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Control typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Rotary
Cord lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.2 m
Handle(s)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Non-slip feetKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
On/off switchKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Safety lockKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Material1 differ
Bowl materialKnown for one	Plastic	Unknown — not stated by the source
MaterialDiffers	Metal, Plastic	Plastic
Power1 differ
PowerDiffers	800 W	200 W
AC input frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50 - 60 Hz
AC input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	220-240 V
Weight & dimensions4 differ
DepthDiffers	390 mm	408 mm
HeightDiffers	290 mm	240 mm
WidthDiffers	235 mm	192 mm
WeightDiffers	6.49 kg	1.92 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	485 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	306 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	376 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	9.7 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
BeatersKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
SpatulaKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
WhiskKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
FunctionsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More food processor comparisons

All food processor comparisons