Product comparison · 2 food processors

Kenwood AT358 food processor vs Kenwood KMC570 food processor

Add a product
  • 15specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 9identical
  • 11known for one product only

Key differences

  • Bowl capacity
    • AT358 food processor:1.6 L
    • KMC570 food processor:4.6 L
  • Power
    • AT358 food processor:1200 W
    • KMC570 food processor:1000 W
  • Depth
    • AT358 food processor:195 mm
    • KMC570 food processor:390 mm
  • Height
    • AT358 food processor:275 mm
    • KMC570 food processor:285 mm
  • Width
    • AT358 food processor:140 mm
    • KMC570 food processor:230 mm
  • Weight
    • AT358 food processor:2.2 kg
    • KMC570 food processor:7.7 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of AT358, KMC570
26 specifications
Features1 differ
Bowl capacityDiffers1.6 L4.6 L
CapacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.7 kg
Cord storageKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Easy to cleanKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Non-slip feetKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Materialidentical
Blender beaker cupKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceGlass
Power1 differ
PowerDiffers1200 W1000 W
Weight & dimensions4 differ
DepthDiffers195 mm390 mm
HeightDiffers275 mm285 mm
WidthDiffers140 mm230 mm
WeightDiffers2.2 kg7.7 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source655 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source305 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source472 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source12.3 kg
Packaging contentidentical
BeatersKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Bowls includedKnown for oneDoughUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More food processor comparisons

All food processor comparisons