Product comparison · 2 food processors

Daewoo SDA2100GE food processor vs Philips HR7304/92 food processor

11specifications compared
8differ
3identical
28known for one product only

Key differences

The Daewoo SDA2100GE food processor has 0.5 L more bowl capacity than the Philips HR7304/92 food processor (2 L vs 1.5 L). The Philips HR7304/92 food processor has 250 W more power than the Daewoo SDA2100GE food processor (1000 W vs 750 W). The Daewoo SDA2100GE food processor has 108 mm more depth than the Philips HR7304/92 food processor (320 mm vs 212 mm).

Bowl capacity
- SDA2100GE food processor:2 L
- HR7304/92 food processor:1.5 L
Power
- SDA2100GE food processor:750 W
- HR7304/92 food processor:1000 W
Depth
- SDA2100GE food processor:320 mm
- HR7304/92 food processor:212 mm
Height
- SDA2100GE food processor:200 mm
- HR7304/92 food processor:327 mm
Width
- SDA2100GE food processor:230 mm
- HR7304/92 food processor:19.4 mm
Package width
- SDA2100GE food processor:382 mm
- HR7304/92 food processor:255 mm
Package depth
- SDA2100GE food processor:418 mm
- HR7304/92 food processor:377 mm
Package height
- SDA2100GE food processor:375 mm
- HR7304/92 food processor:393 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of SDA2100GE, HR7304/92
39 specifications	A Daewoo SDA2100GE food processor Model SDA2100GE View product	B Philips HR7304/92 food processor Model HR7304/92 View product
Features1 differ
Bowl capacityDiffers	2 L	1.5 L
Product colour	Black	Black
Variable speed	Yes	Yes
Pulse function	Yes	Yes
Built-in scalesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Citrus pressKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Coffee grindingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Meat mincerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Mixer functionsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Blend, Beat
Interchangeable bladesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Cord lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.8 m
Dishwasher-proof partsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Non-slip feetKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Number of speedsKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
French fry discKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Displayidentical
Built-in displayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Materialidentical
Housing materialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Plastic
Bowl materialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	SAN
Material jar(s)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	SAN
Blade materialKnown for one	Stainless steel	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
PowerDiffers	750 W	1000 W
AC input frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50-60 Hz
AC input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	220 V
Weight & dimensions3 differ
DepthDiffers	320 mm	212 mm
HeightDiffers	200 mm	327 mm
WidthDiffers	230 mm	19.4 mm
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.82 kg
Packaging data3 differ
Package widthDiffers	382 mm	255 mm
Package depthDiffers	418 mm	377 mm
Package heightDiffers	375 mm	393 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4.01 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Slicing disc includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Chopper blade includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Emulsifying discKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Pasta makerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Technical detailsidentical
Dangerous goodsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Other featuresidentical
Doesn't containKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Bisphenol A (BPA)
Warranty periodKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2 year(s)
Country of originKnown for one	China	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More food processor comparisons

All food processor comparisons