Philips Fax with answering machine and DECT PPF685E/TRB vs Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax

Key differences

The Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax has 19.2 Kbit/s more modem speed than the Philips Fax with answering machine and DECT PPF685E/TRB (33.6 Kbit/s vs 14.4 Kbit/s). The Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax has 75 locations more fax broadcasting than the Philips Fax with answering machine and DECT PPF685E/TRB (80 locations vs 5 locations). The Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax has 84 copies more maximum copies than the Philips Fax with answering machine and DECT PPF685E/TRB (99 copies vs 15 copies). Print technology: Thermal on the Philips Fax with answering machine and DECT PPF685E/TRB, Laser on the Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax. Operating relative humidity (H-H): 15 - 85% on the Philips Fax with answering machine and DECT PPF685E/TRB, 20 - 80% on the Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax.

• Print technology
  • Fax with answering machine and DECT PPF685E/TRB:Thermal
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:Laser
• Modem speed
  • Fax with answering machine and DECT PPF685E/TRB:14.4 Kbit/s
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:33.6 Kbit/s
• Fax broadcasting
  • Fax with answering machine and DECT PPF685E/TRB:5 locations
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:80 locations
• Maximum number of copies
  • Fax with answering machine and DECT PPF685E/TRB:15 copies
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:99 copies
• Standard input capacity
  • Fax with answering machine and DECT PPF685E/TRB:50 sheets
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:250 sheets
• Auto document feeder (ADF) input capacity
  • Fax with answering machine and DECT PPF685E/TRB:10 sheets
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:20 sheets
• Fax memory
  • Fax with answering machine and DECT PPF685E/TRB:50 pages
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:160 pages
• Weight
  • Fax with answering machine and DECT PPF685E/TRB:3.4 kg
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:11 kg