Philips Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675E/PLB vs Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax

Key differences

The Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax has 19.2 Kbit/s more modem speed than the Philips Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675E/PLB (33.6 Kbit/s vs 14.4 Kbit/s). The Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax has 84 copies more maximum copies than the Philips Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675E/PLB (99 copies vs 15 copies). The Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax has 200 sheets more standard input capacity than the Philips Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675E/PLB (250 sheets vs 50 sheets). Print technology: Thermal on the Philips Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675E/PLB, Laser on the Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax.

• Print technology
  • Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675E/PLB:Thermal
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:Laser
• Modem speed
  • Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675E/PLB:14.4 Kbit/s
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:33.6 Kbit/s
• Maximum number of copies
  • Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675E/PLB:15 copies
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:99 copies
• Standard input capacity
  • Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675E/PLB:50 sheets
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:250 sheets
• Auto document feeder (ADF) input capacity
  • Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675E/PLB:10 sheets
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:20 sheets
• Fax memory
  • Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675E/PLB:50 pages
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:160 pages
• Weight
  • Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675E/PLB:2.3 kg
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:11 kg
• Power consumption (standby)
  • Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675E/PLB:1.4 W
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:95 W