Philips PPF675E/HUB fax machine Thermal 14.4 Kbit/s A4 vs Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax

Key differences

The Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax has 19.2 Kbit/s more modem speed than the Philips PPF675E/HUB fax machine Thermal 14.4 Kbit/s A4 (33.6 Kbit/s vs 14.4 Kbit/s). The Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax has 10 sheets more auto document feeder (ADF) input capacity than the Philips PPF675E/HUB fax machine Thermal 14.4 Kbit/s A4 (20 sheets vs 10 sheets). The Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax has 110 pages more fax memory than the Philips PPF675E/HUB fax machine Thermal 14.4 Kbit/s A4 (160 pages vs 50 pages). Print technology: Thermal on the Philips PPF675E/HUB fax machine Thermal 14.4 Kbit/s A4, Laser on the Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax. Dimensions (WxDxH): 377 x 247 x 200 mm on the Philips PPF675E/HUB fax machine Thermal 14.4 Kbit/s A4, 383.7 x 416.8 x 334.9 mm on the Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax.

• Print technology
  • PPF675E/HUB fax machine Thermal 14.4 Kbit/s A4:Thermal
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:Laser
• Modem speed
  • PPF675E/HUB fax machine Thermal 14.4 Kbit/s A4:14.4 Kbit/s
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:33.6 Kbit/s
• Auto document feeder (ADF) input capacity
  • PPF675E/HUB fax machine Thermal 14.4 Kbit/s A4:10 sheets
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:20 sheets
• Fax memory
  • PPF675E/HUB fax machine Thermal 14.4 Kbit/s A4:50 pages
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:160 pages
• Dimensions (WxDxH)
  • PPF675E/HUB fax machine Thermal 14.4 Kbit/s A4:377 x 247 x 200 mm
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:383.7 x 416.8 x 334.9 mm
• Weight
  • PPF675E/HUB fax machine Thermal 14.4 Kbit/s A4:3 kg
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:11 kg
• Power consumption (typical)
  • PPF675E/HUB fax machine Thermal 14.4 Kbit/s A4:15 W
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:300 W
• Power consumption (standby)
  • PPF675E/HUB fax machine Thermal 14.4 Kbit/s A4:1.4 W
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:95 W