Philips Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675/RUB vs Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax

Key differences

The Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax has 19.2 Kbit/s more modem speed than the Philips Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675/RUB (33.6 Kbit/s vs 14.4 Kbit/s). The Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax has 75 locations more fax broadcasting than the Philips Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675/RUB (80 locations vs 5 locations). The Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax has 89 copies more maximum copies than the Philips Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675/RUB (99 copies vs 10 copies). Print technology: Thermal on the Philips Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675/RUB, Laser on the Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax. Dimensions (WxDxH): 313 x 197 x 129 mm on the Philips Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675/RUB, 383.7 x 416.8 x 334.9 mm on the Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax.

• Print technology
  • Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675/RUB:Thermal
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:Laser
• Modem speed
  • Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675/RUB:14.4 Kbit/s
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:33.6 Kbit/s
• Fax broadcasting
  • Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675/RUB:5 locations
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:80 locations
• Maximum number of copies
  • Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675/RUB:10 copies
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:99 copies
• Auto document feeder (ADF) input capacity
  • Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675/RUB:50 sheets
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:20 sheets
• Fax memory
  • Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675/RUB:50 pages
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:160 pages
• Dimensions (WxDxH)
  • Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675/RUB:313 x 197 x 129 mm
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:383.7 x 416.8 x 334.9 mm
• Weight
  • Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675/RUB:2.3 kg
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:11 kg