Philips PPF650E/ATB fax machine Thermal 9.6 Kbit/s A4 Black vs Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax

Key differences

The Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax has 24 Kbit/s more modem speed than the Philips PPF650E/ATB fax machine Thermal 9.6 Kbit/s A4 Black (33.6 Kbit/s vs 9.6 Kbit/s). The Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax has 84 copies more maximum copies than the Philips PPF650E/ATB fax machine Thermal 9.6 Kbit/s A4 Black (99 copies vs 15 copies). The Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax has 200 sheets more standard input capacity than the Philips PPF650E/ATB fax machine Thermal 9.6 Kbit/s A4 Black (250 sheets vs 50 sheets). Print technology: Thermal on the Philips PPF650E/ATB fax machine Thermal 9.6 Kbit/s A4 Black, Laser on the Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax.

• Print technology
  • PPF650E/ATB fax machine Thermal 9.6 Kbit/s A4 Black:Thermal
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:Laser
• Modem speed
  • PPF650E/ATB fax machine Thermal 9.6 Kbit/s A4 Black:9.6 Kbit/s
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:33.6 Kbit/s
• Maximum number of copies
  • PPF650E/ATB fax machine Thermal 9.6 Kbit/s A4 Black:15 copies
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:99 copies
• Standard input capacity
  • PPF650E/ATB fax machine Thermal 9.6 Kbit/s A4 Black:50 sheets
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:250 sheets
• Auto document feeder (ADF) input capacity
  • PPF650E/ATB fax machine Thermal 9.6 Kbit/s A4 Black:10 sheets
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:20 sheets
• Fax memory
  • PPF650E/ATB fax machine Thermal 9.6 Kbit/s A4 Black:15 pages
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:160 pages
• Power consumption (typical)
  • PPF650E/ATB fax machine Thermal 9.6 Kbit/s A4 Black:15 W
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:300 W
• Power consumption (standby)
  • PPF650E/ATB fax machine Thermal 9.6 Kbit/s A4 Black:2.5 W
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:95 W