Philips Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/DEW vs Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax

Key differences

The Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax has 24 Kbit/s more modem speed than the Philips Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/DEW (33.6 Kbit/s vs 9.6 Kbit/s). The Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax has 84 copies more maximum copies than the Philips Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/DEW (99 copies vs 15 copies). The Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax has 10 sheets more auto document feeder (ADF) input capacity than the Philips Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/DEW (20 sheets vs 10 sheets). Print technology: Thermal on the Philips Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/DEW, Laser on the Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax.

• Print technology
  • Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/DEW:Thermal
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:Laser
• Modem speed
  • Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/DEW:9.6 Kbit/s
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:33.6 Kbit/s
• Maximum number of copies
  • Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/DEW:15 copies
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:99 copies
• Auto document feeder (ADF) input capacity
  • Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/DEW:10 sheets
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:20 sheets
• Fax memory
  • Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/DEW:15 pages
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:160 pages
• Weight
  • Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/DEW:3 kg
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:11 kg
• Power consumption (typical)
  • Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/DEW:15 W
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:300 W
• Power consumption (standby)
  • Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/DEW:1.4 W
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:95 W