Philips Fax with telephone and copier PPF631E/TRB vs Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax

Key differences

The Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax has 24 Kbit/s more modem speed than the Philips Fax with telephone and copier PPF631E/TRB (33.6 Kbit/s vs 9.6 Kbit/s). The Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax has 84 copies more maximum copies than the Philips Fax with telephone and copier PPF631E/TRB (99 copies vs 15 copies). The Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax has 200 sheets more standard input capacity than the Philips Fax with telephone and copier PPF631E/TRB (250 sheets vs 50 sheets). Print technology: Thermal on the Philips Fax with telephone and copier PPF631E/TRB, Laser on the Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax.

• Print technology
  • Fax with telephone and copier PPF631E/TRB:Thermal
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:Laser
• Modem speed
  • Fax with telephone and copier PPF631E/TRB:9.6 Kbit/s
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:33.6 Kbit/s
• Maximum number of copies
  • Fax with telephone and copier PPF631E/TRB:15 copies
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:99 copies
• Standard input capacity
  • Fax with telephone and copier PPF631E/TRB:50 sheets
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:250 sheets
• Auto document feeder (ADF) input capacity
  • Fax with telephone and copier PPF631E/TRB:10 sheets
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:20 sheets
• Fax memory
  • Fax with telephone and copier PPF631E/TRB:15 pages
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:160 pages
• Power consumption (typical)
  • Fax with telephone and copier PPF631E/TRB:15 W
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:300 W
• Power consumption (standby)
  • Fax with telephone and copier PPF631E/TRB:1.4 W
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:95 W