Philips Fax with telephone and copier PPF631E/DEB vs Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax

Key differences

The Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax has 24 Kbit/s more modem speed than the Philips Fax with telephone and copier PPF631E/DEB (33.6 Kbit/s vs 9.6 Kbit/s). The Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax has 200 sheets more standard input capacity than the Philips Fax with telephone and copier PPF631E/DEB (250 sheets vs 50 sheets). The Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax has 10 sheets more auto document feeder (ADF) input capacity than the Philips Fax with telephone and copier PPF631E/DEB (20 sheets vs 10 sheets). Print technology: Thermal on the Philips Fax with telephone and copier PPF631E/DEB, Laser on the Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax. Dimensions (WxDxH): 377 x 247 x 200 mm on the Philips Fax with telephone and copier PPF631E/DEB, 383.7 x 416.8 x 334.9 mm on the Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax.

• Print technology
  • Fax with telephone and copier PPF631E/DEB:Thermal
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:Laser
• Modem speed
  • Fax with telephone and copier PPF631E/DEB:9.6 Kbit/s
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:33.6 Kbit/s
• Standard input capacity
  • Fax with telephone and copier PPF631E/DEB:50 sheets
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:250 sheets
• Auto document feeder (ADF) input capacity
  • Fax with telephone and copier PPF631E/DEB:10 sheets
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:20 sheets
• Fax memory
  • Fax with telephone and copier PPF631E/DEB:15 pages
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:160 pages
• Dimensions (WxDxH)
  • Fax with telephone and copier PPF631E/DEB:377 x 247 x 200 mm
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:383.7 x 416.8 x 334.9 mm
• Power consumption (typical)
  • Fax with telephone and copier PPF631E/DEB:15 W
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:300 W
• Power consumption (standby)
  • Fax with telephone and copier PPF631E/DEB:1.4 W
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:95 W