Philips PPF631E/CZB fax machine Thermal 9.6 Kbit/s A4 Black vs Philips Fax with copier SMS and DECT PPF650E/NLB

Key differences

The Philips Fax with copier SMS and DECT PPF650E/NLB has 1.1 W more power consumption (standby) than the Philips PPF631E/CZB fax machine Thermal 9.6 Kbit/s A4 Black (2.5 W vs 1.4 W). The Philips PPF631E/CZB fax machine Thermal 9.6 Kbit/s A4 Black has 3.85 more vertical resolution fine (lines/mm) than the Philips Fax with copier SMS and DECT PPF650E/NLB (7.7 vs 3.85). Handset type: Wired handset on the Philips PPF631E/CZB fax machine Thermal 9.6 Kbit/s A4 Black, Wireless handset on the Philips Fax with copier SMS and DECT PPF650E/NLB. ITU-supported standards: T.30 on the Philips PPF631E/CZB fax machine Thermal 9.6 Kbit/s A4 Black, T .30 on the Philips Fax with copier SMS and DECT PPF650E/NLB.

• Handset type
  • PPF631E/CZB fax machine Thermal 9.6 Kbit/s A4 Black:Wired handset
  • Fax with copier SMS and DECT PPF650E/NLB:Wireless handset
• Power consumption (standby)
  • PPF631E/CZB fax machine Thermal 9.6 Kbit/s A4 Black:1.4 W
  • Fax with copier SMS and DECT PPF650E/NLB:2.5 W
• ITU-supported standards
  • PPF631E/CZB fax machine Thermal 9.6 Kbit/s A4 Black:T.30
  • Fax with copier SMS and DECT PPF650E/NLB:T .30
• Vertical resolution fine (lines/mm)
  • PPF631E/CZB fax machine Thermal 9.6 Kbit/s A4 Black:7.7
  • Fax with copier SMS and DECT PPF650E/NLB:3.85