Philips Laserfax with printer and scanner LPF935/CNB vs Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax

Key differences

The Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax has 19.2 Kbit/s more modem speed than the Philips Laserfax with printer and scanner LPF935/CNB (33.6 Kbit/s vs 14.4 Kbit/s). The Philips Laserfax with printer and scanner LPF935/CNB has 127 locations more fax broadcasting than the Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax (207 locations vs 80 locations). The Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax has 60 pages more fax memory than the Philips Laserfax with printer and scanner LPF935/CNB (160 pages vs 100 pages). Copier resize: 25 - 400% on the Philips Laserfax with printer and scanner LPF935/CNB, 50 - 150% on the Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax. Dimensions (WxDxH): 370 x 330 x 200 mm on the Philips Laserfax with printer and scanner LPF935/CNB, 383.7 x 416.8 x 334.9 mm on the Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax.

• Modem speed
  • Laserfax with printer and scanner LPF935/CNB:14.4 Kbit/s
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:33.6 Kbit/s
• Fax broadcasting
  • Laserfax with printer and scanner LPF935/CNB:207 locations
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:80 locations
• Copier resize
  • Laserfax with printer and scanner LPF935/CNB:25 - 400%
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:50 - 150%
• Fax memory
  • Laserfax with printer and scanner LPF935/CNB:100 pages
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:160 pages
• Dimensions (WxDxH)
  • Laserfax with printer and scanner LPF935/CNB:370 x 330 x 200 mm
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:383.7 x 416.8 x 334.9 mm
• Weight
  • Laserfax with printer and scanner LPF935/CNB:7.9 kg
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:11 kg
• Operating temperature (T-T)
  • Laserfax with printer and scanner LPF935/CNB:5 - 35 °C
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:10 - 32 °C
• Operating relative humidity (H-H)
  • Laserfax with printer and scanner LPF935/CNB:15 - 85%
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:20 - 80%