Philips Fax with telephone and copier LPF5125/ESB vs Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax

Key differences

The Philips Fax with telephone and copier LPF5125/ESB has 3 sec/page more fax transmission speed than the Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax (6 sec/page vs 3 sec/page). The Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax has 9,950 pages per month more maximum duty cycle than the Philips Fax with telephone and copier LPF5125/ESB (10000 pages per month vs 50 pages per month). The Philips Fax with telephone and copier LPF5125/ESB has 10 sheets more auto document feeder (ADF) input capacity than the Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax (30 sheets vs 20 sheets). Fax resolution: 600 x 600 DPI on the Philips Fax with telephone and copier LPF5125/ESB, 203 x 392 DPI on the Samsung SF-560 Laser Fax.

• Fax resolution
  • Fax with telephone and copier LPF5125/ESB:600 x 600 DPI
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:203 x 392 DPI
• Fax transmission speed
  • Fax with telephone and copier LPF5125/ESB:6 sec/page
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:3 sec/page
• Maximum duty cycle
  • Fax with telephone and copier LPF5125/ESB:50 pages per month
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:10000 pages per month
• Auto document feeder (ADF) input capacity
  • Fax with telephone and copier LPF5125/ESB:30 sheets
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:20 sheets
• Fax memory
  • Fax with telephone and copier LPF5125/ESB:200 pages
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:160 pages
• Weight
  • Fax with telephone and copier LPF5125/ESB:8 kg
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:11 kg
• Power consumption (typical)
  • Fax with telephone and copier LPF5125/ESB:15 W
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:300 W
• Power consumption (standby)
  • Fax with telephone and copier LPF5125/ESB:4 W
  • SF-560 Laser Fax:95 W