HP 1040 Fax vs Philips Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/DEW

Key differences

The HP 1040 Fax has 4.8 Kbit/s more modem speed than the Philips Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/DEW (14.4 Kbit/s vs 9.6 Kbit/s). The HP 1040 Fax has 60 copies more maximum copies than the Philips Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/DEW (75 copies vs 15 copies). The HP 1040 Fax has 48 more greyscale levels than the Philips Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/DEW (64 vs 16). Print technology: Inkjet on the HP 1040 Fax, Thermal on the Philips Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/DEW. Package dimensions (WxDxH): 431.8 x 371.6 x 241.3 mm on the HP 1040 Fax, 313 x 197 x 129 mm on the Philips Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/DEW.

• Print technology
  • 1040 Fax:Inkjet
  • Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/DEW:Thermal
• Modem speed
  • 1040 Fax:14.4 Kbit/s
  • Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/DEW:9.6 Kbit/s
• Maximum number of copies
  • 1040 Fax:75 copies
  • Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/DEW:15 copies
• Greyscale levels
  • 1040 Fax:64
  • Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/DEW:16
• Fax memory
  • 1040 Fax:100 pages
  • Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/DEW:15 pages
• Weight
  • 1040 Fax:3.4 kg
  • Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/DEW:3 kg
• Package dimensions (WxDxH)
  • 1040 Fax:431.8 x 371.6 x 241.3 mm
  • Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/DEW:313 x 197 x 129 mm
• Package weight
  • 1040 Fax:4.88 kg
  • Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/DEW:2.3 kg