Canon L2000IP Laserfax vs Philips Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675E/CHB

Key differences

The Canon L2000IP Laserfax has 19.2 Kbit/s more modem speed than the Philips Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675E/CHB (33.6 Kbit/s vs 14.4 Kbit/s). The Canon L2000IP Laserfax has 192 more greyscale levels than the Philips Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675E/CHB (256 vs 64). The Canon L2000IP Laserfax has 450 sheets more standard input capacity than the Philips Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675E/CHB (500 sheets vs 50 sheets). Print technology: Laser on the Canon L2000IP Laserfax, Thermal on the Philips Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675E/CHB.

• Print technology
  • L2000IP Laserfax:Laser
  • Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675E/CHB:Thermal
• Modem speed
  • L2000IP Laserfax:33.6 Kbit/s
  • Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675E/CHB:14.4 Kbit/s
• Greyscale levels
  • L2000IP Laserfax:256
  • Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675E/CHB:64
• Standard input capacity
  • L2000IP Laserfax:500 sheets
  • Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675E/CHB:50 sheets
• Auto document feeder (ADF) input capacity
  • L2000IP Laserfax:70 sheets
  • Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675E/CHB:10 sheets
• Fax memory
  • L2000IP Laserfax:1500 pages
  • Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675E/CHB:50 pages
• Weight
  • L2000IP Laserfax:24 kg
  • Magic 5 Eco Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675E/CHB:2.3 kg