Canon L2000IP Laserfax vs Philips Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675/RUB

Key differences

The Canon L2000IP Laserfax has 19.2 Kbit/s more modem speed than the Philips Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675/RUB (33.6 Kbit/s vs 14.4 Kbit/s). The Canon L2000IP Laserfax has 205 locations more fax broadcasting than the Philips Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675/RUB (210 locations vs 5 locations). The Canon L2000IP Laserfax has 62 more one-touch dials than the Philips Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675/RUB (72 vs 10). Print technology: Laser on the Canon L2000IP Laserfax, Thermal on the Philips Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675/RUB. Dimensions (WxDxH): 499 x 498.7 x 458.9 mm on the Canon L2000IP Laserfax, 313 x 197 x 129 mm on the Philips Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675/RUB.

• Print technology
  • L2000IP Laserfax:Laser
  • Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675/RUB:Thermal
• Modem speed
  • L2000IP Laserfax:33.6 Kbit/s
  • Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675/RUB:14.4 Kbit/s
• Fax broadcasting
  • L2000IP Laserfax:210 locations
  • Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675/RUB:5 locations
• One-touch dials
  • L2000IP Laserfax:72
  • Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675/RUB:10
• Greyscale levels
  • L2000IP Laserfax:256
  • Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675/RUB:64
• Auto document feeder (ADF) input capacity
  • L2000IP Laserfax:70 sheets
  • Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675/RUB:50 sheets
• Fax memory
  • L2000IP Laserfax:1500 pages
  • Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675/RUB:50 pages
• Dimensions (WxDxH)
  • L2000IP Laserfax:499 x 498.7 x 458.9 mm
  • Fax with telephone and answering machine PPF675/RUB:313 x 197 x 129 mm