Canon L2000IP Laserfax vs Philips Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/PNW

Key differences

The Canon L2000IP Laserfax has 24 Kbit/s more modem speed than the Philips Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/PNW (33.6 Kbit/s vs 9.6 Kbit/s). The Canon L2000IP Laserfax has 240 more greyscale levels than the Philips Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/PNW (256 vs 16). The Canon L2000IP Laserfax has 60 sheets more auto document feeder (ADF) input capacity than the Philips Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/PNW (70 sheets vs 10 sheets). Print technology: Laser on the Canon L2000IP Laserfax, Thermal on the Philips Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/PNW.

• Print technology
  • L2000IP Laserfax:Laser
  • Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/PNW:Thermal
• Modem speed
  • L2000IP Laserfax:33.6 Kbit/s
  • Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/PNW:9.6 Kbit/s
• Greyscale levels
  • L2000IP Laserfax:256
  • Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/PNW:16
• Auto document feeder (ADF) input capacity
  • L2000IP Laserfax:70 sheets
  • Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/PNW:10 sheets
• Fax memory
  • L2000IP Laserfax:1500 pages
  • Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/PNW:15 pages
• Weight
  • L2000IP Laserfax:24 kg
  • Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/PNW:3 kg
• Power consumption (typical)
  • L2000IP Laserfax:980 W
  • Fax with telephone and copier PPF632E/PNW:15 W