Canon L2000IP Laserfax vs Philips Fax with telephone and copier LPF5125/PLB

Key differences

The Philips Fax with telephone and copier LPF5125/PLB has 3 sec/page more fax transmission speed than the Canon L2000IP Laserfax (6 sec/page vs 3 sec/page). The Canon L2000IP Laserfax has 192 more greyscale levels than the Philips Fax with telephone and copier LPF5125/PLB (256 vs 64). The Canon L2000IP Laserfax has 250 sheets more standard input capacity than the Philips Fax with telephone and copier LPF5125/PLB (500 sheets vs 250 sheets). Fax resolution: 203 x 98 DPI on the Canon L2000IP Laserfax, 600 x 600 DPI on the Philips Fax with telephone and copier LPF5125/PLB.

• Fax resolution
  • L2000IP Laserfax:203 x 98 DPI
  • Fax with telephone and copier LPF5125/PLB:600 x 600 DPI
• Fax transmission speed
  • L2000IP Laserfax:3 sec/page
  • Fax with telephone and copier LPF5125/PLB:6 sec/page
• Greyscale levels
  • L2000IP Laserfax:256
  • Fax with telephone and copier LPF5125/PLB:64
• Standard input capacity
  • L2000IP Laserfax:500 sheets
  • Fax with telephone and copier LPF5125/PLB:250 sheets
• Auto document feeder (ADF) input capacity
  • L2000IP Laserfax:70 sheets
  • Fax with telephone and copier LPF5125/PLB:30 sheets
• Fax memory
  • L2000IP Laserfax:1500 pages
  • Fax with telephone and copier LPF5125/PLB:200 pages
• Weight
  • L2000IP Laserfax:24 kg
  • Fax with telephone and copier LPF5125/PLB:8 kg
• Power consumption (typical)
  • L2000IP Laserfax:980 W
  • Fax with telephone and copier LPF5125/PLB:15 W