Product comparison · 2 external hard drives

Iomega REV 35GB USB 2.0 External Drive vs Iomega StorCenter Network Hard Drive 1 TB

Add a product
  • 10specifications compared
  • 7differ
  • 3identical
  • 31known for one product only

Key differences

  • HDD capacity
    • REV 35GB USB 2.0 External Drive:90 GB
    • StorCenter Network Hard Drive 1 TB:1 TB
  • HDD speed
    • REV 35GB USB 2.0 External Drive:4200 RPM
    • StorCenter Network Hard Drive 1 TB:7200 RPM
  • Product colour
    • REV 35GB USB 2.0 External Drive:Blue
    • StorCenter Network Hard Drive 1 TB:Black, Grey
  • Weight
    • REV 35GB USB 2.0 External Drive:73 g
    • StorCenter Network Hard Drive 1 TB:2.2 kg
  • Minimum RAM
    • REV 35GB USB 2.0 External Drive:512 MB
    • StorCenter Network Hard Drive 1 TB:128 MB
  • Dimensions (WxDxH)
    • REV 35GB USB 2.0 External Drive:111.76 x 157.48 x 33.02 mm
    • StorCenter Network Hard Drive 1 TB:80 x 200 x 124.97 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of REV 35GB USB 2.0 External Drive, StorCenter Network Hard Drive 1 TB
41 specifications
Hard drive2 differ
HDD capacityDiffers90 GB1 TB
HDD speedDiffers4200 RPM7200 RPM
Storage drive buffer sizeKnown for one18 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB connectorKnown for oneUSBUnknown — not stated by the source
USB versionKnown for one2.0Unknown — not stated by the source
Wi-FiKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
FireWire 400Known for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
FireWire 800Known for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LANKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Features1 differ
Product colourDiffersBlueBlack, Grey
Plug and PlayKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Bus poweredKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Known for one5 WUnknown — not stated by the source
External power adapterKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating shockKnown for one60 GUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers73 g2.2 kg
Other features3 differ
Average latencyKnown for one7.1 msUnknown — not stated by the source
Bytes per sectorKnown for one2048Unknown — not stated by the source
HDD number of headsKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Minimum RAMDiffers512 MB128 MB
Minimum processorKnown for onePentium 350MHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Minimum storage drive spaceKnown for one1024 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Minimum system requirementsDiffersWindows Me/98/2000/XP/Professional/Professional x64/2000 Professional/Server 2003/Vista/Mac OS X 10.4Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0, Firefox 1.5, Netscape 8.0+, 10/100/1000 Ethernet
MountingKnown for oneHorizontalUnknown — not stated by the source
Native capacityKnown for one120 GBUnknown — not stated by the source
Non-operating shockKnown for one200 GUnknown — not stated by the source
Protective rubber jacketKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Read seek timeKnown for one2.5 msUnknown — not stated by the source
Recording densityKnown for one48 kbit/inchUnknown — not stated by the source
Track to track seek timeKnown for one12 msUnknown — not stated by the source
USB cableKnown for oneUSBUnknown — not stated by the source
USB requiredKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Write seek timeKnown for one3 msUnknown — not stated by the source
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs111.76 x 157.48 x 33.02 mm80 x 200 x 124.97 mm
FireWire cableKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Quick start guideKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMicrosoft Windows 2000 / XP / XP x64 / Vista / Mac OS X 10.3.9+

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More external hard drive comparisons

All external hard drive comparisons