Product comparison · 2 external hard drives

Iomega HD 120GB USB2.0&Fwire 7200rpm 3.5" vs Iomega HD 40GB USB2.0 5400rpm 3.5" inch drive

7specifications compared
3differ
4identical
3known for one product only

Key differences

The Iomega HD 120GB USB2.0&Fwire 7200rpm 3.5" has 80 GB more HDD capacity than the Iomega HD 40GB USB2.0 5400rpm 3.5" inch drive (120 GB vs 40 GB). Weight: 3.4 kg on the Iomega HD 120GB USB2.0&Fwire 7200rpm 3.5", 670 g on the Iomega HD 40GB USB2.0 5400rpm 3.5" inch drive. Dimensions (WxDxH): 284.5 x 215.9 x 254 mm on the Iomega HD 120GB USB2.0&Fwire 7200rpm 3.5", 238.7 x 215.9 x 76.2 mm on the Iomega HD 40GB USB2.0 5400rpm 3.5" inch drive.

HDD capacity
- HD 120GB USB2.0&Fwire 7200rpm 3.5":120 GB
- HD 40GB USB2.0 5400rpm 3.5" inch drive:40 GB
Weight
- HD 120GB USB2.0&Fwire 7200rpm 3.5":3.4 kg
- HD 40GB USB2.0 5400rpm 3.5" inch drive:670 g
Dimensions (WxDxH)
- HD 120GB USB2.0&Fwire 7200rpm 3.5":284.5 x 215.9 x 254 mm
- HD 40GB USB2.0 5400rpm 3.5" inch drive:238.7 x 215.9 x 76.2 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of HD 120GB USB2.0&Fwire 7200rpm 3.5", HD 40GB USB2.0 5400rpm 3.5" inch drive
10 specifications	A Iomega HD 120GB USB2.0&Fwire 7200rpm 3.5"View product	B Iomega HD 40GB USB2.0 5400rpm 3.5" inch drive View product
Hard drive1 differ
HDD capacityDiffers	120 GB	40 GB
HDD speedKnown for one	7200 RPM	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
FireWire 400Known for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	3.4 kg	670 g
Other features1 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	284.5 x 215.9 x 254 mm	238.7 x 215.9 x 76.2 mm
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	84717050

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More external hard drive comparisons

All external hard drive comparisons