Product comparison · 2 external hard drives

Iomega eGo Hard Drive - 160GB - USB 2.0 vs Iomega StorCenter Network Hard Drive, 750GB

Add a product
  • 7specifications compared
  • 3differ
  • 4identical
  • 36known for one product only

Key differences

  • HDD capacity
    • eGo Hard Drive - 160GB - USB 2.0:160 GB
    • StorCenter Network Hard Drive, 750GB:750 GB
  • HDD speed
    • eGo Hard Drive - 160GB - USB 2.0:5400 RPM
    • StorCenter Network Hard Drive, 750GB:7200 RPM
  • Weight
    • eGo Hard Drive - 160GB - USB 2.0:217.73 g
    • StorCenter Network Hard Drive, 750GB:1.4 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of eGo Hard Drive - 160GB - USB 2.0, StorCenter Network Hard Drive, 750GB
43 specifications
Hard drive2 differ
HDD capacityDiffers160 GB750 GB
HDD speedDiffers5400 RPM7200 RPM
HDD sizeKnown for one2.5"Unknown — not stated by the source
TypeHDDHDD
Storage drive buffer sizeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8 MB
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB connectorUSBUSB
USB version2.02.0
FireWire 400Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
FireWire 800Known for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Card reader integratedKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LANKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Featuresidentical
Product colourKnown for oneSilverUnknown — not stated by the source
Plug and PlayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Bus poweredKnown for oneUSBUnknown — not stated by the source
External power adapterKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers217.73 g1.4 kg
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source43 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source203 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source125 mm
Other featuresidentical
Integrated USB cableKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
HDD transfer rateKnown for one480 Mbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
IntelliPowerKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
InternalNoNo
Mac compatibilityKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Minimum RAMKnown for one128 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Minimum processorKnown for onePentium 300MhzUnknown — not stated by the source
Minimum system requirementsKnown for oneWindows 98/2000/MacUnknown — not stated by the source
Protective rubber jacketKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
USB cableKnown for oneUSBUnknown — not stated by the source
USB requiredKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one88.9 x 19.05 x 133.25 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
FireWire cableKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Networking featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10/100/1000 Mbps
Power requirementsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source110-240VAC@50-60Hz; 5VDC+/-5%; 12VDC+/-5%; 2.5/1A (max.)
Special featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUPnP
Supported network protocolsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceTCP/IP, FTP
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWindows 98SE/Me/2000/2000 Pro/XP Home/XP Pro Mac OS X v.10.2.7 / 10.3 Redhat 9, Mandrake 10, Debian 3.0, Gentoo, Knoppix, Fedora Core 3/4 Linux (ker. 2.4.24)
Technical featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCIFS/SMB (Windows) AFP (Mac) NFS (Linux)
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 - 50 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-40 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 - 95%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 - 95%

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More external hard drive comparisons

All external hard drive comparisons