Product comparison · 2 entertainment robots

Clementoni BABY ROBOT vs Spin Master 6046741 entertainment robot

Add a product
  • 7specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 2identical
  • 30known for one product only

Key differences

The Clementoni BABY ROBOT has 186 mm more package width than the Spin Master 6046741 entertainment robot (320 mm vs 134 mm). The Clementoni BABY ROBOT has 166 mm more package depth than the Spin Master 6046741 entertainment robot (300 mm vs 134 mm). The Clementoni BABY ROBOT has 27 mm more package height than the Spin Master 6046741 entertainment robot (200 mm vs 173 mm). Recommended age (min): 1 yr(s) on the Clementoni BABY ROBOT, 6 yr(s) on the Spin Master 6046741 entertainment robot.

  • Recommended age (min)
    • BABY ROBOT:1 yr(s)
    • 6046741 entertainment robot:6 yr(s)
  • Package width
    • BABY ROBOT:320 mm
    • 6046741 entertainment robot:134 mm
  • Package depth
    • BABY ROBOT:300 mm
    • 6046741 entertainment robot:134 mm
  • Package height
    • BABY ROBOT:200 mm
    • 6046741 entertainment robot:173 mm
  • Package weight
    • BABY ROBOT:800 g
    • 6046741 entertainment robot:360 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of BABY ROBOT, 6046741
37 specifications
Features1 differ
Product colourMulticolourMulticolour
MaterialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePlastic
Suggested genderBoy/GirlBoy/Girl
Recommended age (min)Differs1 yr(s)6 yr(s)
Country of originKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNetherlands
Product typeKnown for oneRobotUnknown — not stated by the source
Recommended age (max)Known for one3 yr(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Sound effectsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of piecesKnown for one1 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source134 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source134 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source173 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source360 g
Package widthDiffers320 mm134 mm
Package depthDiffers300 mm134 mm
Package heightDiffers200 mm173 mm
Package weightDiffers800 g360 g
Packaging contentidentical
Minimum order quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Supplier featuresidentical
Commercial unit typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceConsumer unit single
Country of importation (ISO 3166-1)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceFrance
Customs product code (TARIC)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source9503009990
Manual languages (ISO 639 format)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMulti
Master (outer) case packaging typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCarton
Packaging languages (ISO 639 format)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMulti
Logistics dataidentical
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.2 kg
Pallet gross lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source80 cm
Pallet gross weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source33.6 kg
Pallet gross widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source120 cm
Pallet gross heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source129.6 cm
Layers per palletKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4 pc(s)
Master (outer) case widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source420 mm
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source420 mm
Master (outer) case heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source324 mm
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Poweridentical
Power source typeKnown for oneBatteryUnknown — not stated by the source
Battery typeKnown for oneAAUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of batteries supportedKnown for one3Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More entertainment robot comparisons

All entertainment robot comparisons