Product comparison · 2 embedded computers

LG CL600W-AP 1.5 GHz Intel® Celeron® 128 GB SSD 8 GB vs Viewsonic VPC17-WP-4 embedded computer

Add a product
  • 40specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 27identical
  • 36known for one product only

Key differences

The Viewsonic VPC17-WP-4 embedded computer has 1.7 GHz more processor frequency than the LG CL600W-AP 1.5 GHz Intel® Celeron® 128 GB SSD 8 GB (3.2 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Viewsonic VPC17-WP-4 embedded computer has 128 GB more total storage capacity than the LG CL600W-AP 1.5 GHz Intel® Celeron® 128 GB SSD 8 GB (256 GB vs 128 GB). The Viewsonic VPC17-WP-4 embedded computer has 128 GB more SSD capacity than the LG CL600W-AP 1.5 GHz Intel® Celeron® 128 GB SSD 8 GB (256 GB vs 128 GB). Only the Viewsonic VPC17-WP-4 embedded computer has embedded options available. Processor family: Intel® Celeron® on the LG CL600W-AP 1.5 GHz Intel® Celeron® 128 GB SSD 8 GB, Intel® Core™ i7 on the Viewsonic VPC17-WP-4 embedded computer.

  • Processor frequency
    • CL600W-AP 1.5 GHz Intel® Celeron® 128 GB SSD 8 GB:1.5 GHz
    • VPC17-WP-4 embedded computer:3.2 GHz
  • Processor family
    • CL600W-AP 1.5 GHz Intel® Celeron® 128 GB SSD 8 GB:Intel® Celeron®
    • VPC17-WP-4 embedded computer:Intel® Core™ i7
  • Processor model
    • CL600W-AP 1.5 GHz Intel® Celeron® 128 GB SSD 8 GB:J4105
    • VPC17-WP-4 embedded computer:i7-8700
  • Total storage capacity
    • CL600W-AP 1.5 GHz Intel® Celeron® 128 GB SSD 8 GB:128 GB
    • VPC17-WP-4 embedded computer:256 GB
  • SSD capacity
    • CL600W-AP 1.5 GHz Intel® Celeron® 128 GB SSD 8 GB:128 GB
    • VPC17-WP-4 embedded computer:256 GB
  • On-board graphics card model
    • CL600W-AP 1.5 GHz Intel® Celeron® 128 GB SSD 8 GB:Intel® UHD Graphics 600
    • VPC17-WP-4 embedded computer:Intel® HD Graphics 530
  • Ethernet LAN data rates
    • CL600W-AP 1.5 GHz Intel® Celeron® 128 GB SSD 8 GB:10,100,1000 Mbit/s
    • VPC17-WP-4 embedded computer:1000 Mbit/s
  • USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C ports quantity
    • CL600W-AP 1.5 GHz Intel® Celeron® 128 GB SSD 8 GB:1
    • VPC17-WP-4 embedded computer:0

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of CL600W-AP, VPC17-WP-4
76 specifications
Processor3 differ
Processor frequencyDiffers1.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Processor familyDiffersIntel® Celeron®Intel® Core™ i7
Processor generationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8th gen Intel® Core™ i7
Processor modelDiffersJ4105i7-8700
Bus typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceDMI3
Processor coresKnown for one4Unknown — not stated by the source
Processor boost frequencyKnown for one2.5 GHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Memoryidentical
Maximum internal memoryKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source16 GB
Memory slotsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2x SO-DIMM
Storage2 differ
Total storage capacityDiffers128 GB256 GB
Card reader integratedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
SSD capacityDiffers128 GB256 GB
Graphics1 differ
On-board graphics card modelDiffersIntel® UHD Graphics 600Intel® HD Graphics 530
Network1 differ
Ethernet LAN data ratesDiffers10,100,1000 Mbit/s1000 Mbit/s
Wi-Fi standardsKnown for one802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)Unknown — not stated by the source
Cabling technologyKnown for one10/100/1000Base-T(X)Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces3 differ
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C ports quantityDiffers10
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
HDMI ports quantityDiffers01
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
DisplayPorts quantityDiffers21
DC-in jackKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Software1 differ
Operating system installedDiffersWindows 10 IoT EnterpriseWindows 10 Pro
Operating system architectureKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source64-bit
Processor special features1 differ
Intel Trusted Execution TechnologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Embedded options availableDiffersNoYes
Intel TSX-NIKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Intel Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Intel Clear Video TechnologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Intel TSX-NI versionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.00
Intel Smart Response Technology versionKnown for one0.00Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source95 W
Power supply input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source110-240 V
Power supply input frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50/60 Hz
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-5 - 45 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 - 90%
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCE, R&TTE, FCC, FCC-IC-ID, cTUVus, , RCM, BSMI, NCC
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source246.2 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source32.2 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source265.4 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.9 kg
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source353 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source91 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source312 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.4 kg
Packaging contentidentical
ManualKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Logistics data1 differ
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 pc(s)
Harmonized System (HS) codeDiffers847130008471410000

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More embedded computer comparisons

All embedded computer comparisons