Product comparison · 2 electric griddles

Candy CDVG 30 X vs Whirlpool AKT 325/IX

9specifications compared
7differ
2identical
5known for one product only

Key differences

The Candy CDVG 30 X has 2 mm more width than the Whirlpool AKT 325/IX (290 mm vs 288 mm). The Whirlpool AKT 325/IX has 35 mm more height than the Candy CDVG 30 X (77 mm vs 42 mm). The Whirlpool AKT 325/IX has 2.9 kg more weight than the Candy CDVG 30 X (6.9 kg vs 4 kg).

Width
- CDVG 30 X:290 mm
- AKT 325/IX:288 mm
Height
- CDVG 30 X:42 mm
- AKT 325/IX:77 mm
Weight
- CDVG 30 X:4 kg
- AKT 325/IX:6.9 kg
Package width
- CDVG 30 X:370 mm
- AKT 325/IX:365 mm
Package depth
- CDVG 30 X:570 mm
- AKT 325/IX:575 mm
Package height
- CDVG 30 X:135 mm
- AKT 325/IX:250 mm
Package weight
- CDVG 30 X:5 kg
- AKT 325/IX:8 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CDVG 30 X, AKT 325/IX
14 specifications	A Candy CDVG 30 X View product	B Whirlpool AKT 325/IX View product
Designidentical
Housing materialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Stainless steel
Number of cooking zonesKnown for one	1 zone(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Built-in displayKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
AC input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	230 V
AC input frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50 Hz
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	290 mm	288 mm
HeightDiffers	42 mm	77 mm
WeightDiffers	4 kg	6.9 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	370 mm	365 mm
Package depthDiffers	570 mm	575 mm
Package heightDiffers	135 mm	250 mm
Package weightDiffers	5 kg	8 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More electric griddle comparisons

All electric griddle comparisons