Product comparison · 2 electric citrus presses

Braun TributeCollection CJ 3000 vs Moulinex PC603D electric citrus press

Add a product
  • 13specifications compared
  • 9differ
  • 4identical
  • 26known for one product only

Key differences

The Moulinex PC603D electric citrus press has 80 W more power than the Braun TributeCollection CJ 3000 (100 W vs 20 W). The Moulinex PC603D electric citrus press has 43 mm more package width than the Braun TributeCollection CJ 3000 (213 mm vs 170 mm). The Moulinex PC603D electric citrus press has 53 mm more package depth than the Braun TributeCollection CJ 3000 (223 mm vs 170 mm). Only the Braun TributeCollection CJ 3000 has lid. Only the Braun TributeCollection CJ 3000 has juice container.

  • Product colour
    • TributeCollection CJ 3000:Transparent, White
    • PC603D electric citrus press:Silver
  • Lid
    • TributeCollection CJ 3000:Yes
    • PC603D electric citrus press:No
  • Juice container
    • TributeCollection CJ 3000:Yes
    • PC603D electric citrus press:No
  • Power
    • TributeCollection CJ 3000:20 W
    • PC603D electric citrus press:100 W
  • Weight
    • TributeCollection CJ 3000:700 g
    • PC603D electric citrus press:2.06 kg
  • Package width
    • TributeCollection CJ 3000:170 mm
    • PC603D electric citrus press:213 mm
  • Package depth
    • TributeCollection CJ 3000:170 mm
    • PC603D electric citrus press:223 mm
  • Package height
    • TributeCollection CJ 3000:170 mm
    • PC603D electric citrus press:285 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of TributeCollection CJ 3000, PC603D
39 specifications
Features3 differ
Product colourDiffersTransparent, WhiteSilver
BowlKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Bowl capacityKnown for one0.35 LUnknown — not stated by the source
Removable bowlKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
LidDiffersYesNo
Non-slip feetKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Cord storageYesYes
Handle(s)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Adjustable pulp controlKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Anti-drip functionYesYes
Automatic on/offYesYes
Dishwasher-proof partsYesYes
Double rotation coneKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Easy to cleanKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Juice containerDiffersYesNo
Liquid level indicatorKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
On/off switchKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for oneCEUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of press conesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3
Direct flowKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
MaterialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePlastic
Pulp filterKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power1 differ
PowerDiffers20 W100 W
AC input voltageKnown for one220-240 VUnknown — not stated by the source
AC input frequencyKnown for one50 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Power plug typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceType C
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers700 g2.06 kg
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source170 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source210 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source290 mm
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers170 mm213 mm
Package depthDiffers170 mm223 mm
Package heightDiffers170 mm285 mm
Package weightDiffers839 g2.78 kg
Packaging contentidentical
ManualKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of filtersKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Other featuresidentical
Country of originKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceChina
Logistics dataidentical
Products per shipping (inner) caseKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3 pc(s)
Products per palletKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source45 pc(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More electric citrus press comparisons

All electric citrus press comparisons