Product comparison · 2 electric citrus presses

Ariete 417/07 Juicer Breakfast Wood vs Gorenje CJ100HE electric citrus press

Add a product
  • 17specifications compared
  • 12differ
  • 5identical
  • 21known for one product only

Key differences

The Gorenje CJ100HE electric citrus press has 60 W more power than the Ariete 417/07 Juicer Breakfast Wood (100 W vs 40 W). The Gorenje CJ100HE electric citrus press has 15 mm more width than the Ariete 417/07 Juicer Breakfast Wood (165 mm vs 150 mm). The Gorenje CJ100HE electric citrus press has 45 mm more depth than the Ariete 417/07 Juicer Breakfast Wood (210 mm vs 165 mm). Only the Ariete 417/07 Juicer Breakfast Wood has bowl. Product colour: Wood, Beige on the Ariete 417/07 Juicer Breakfast Wood, Stainless steel on the Gorenje CJ100HE electric citrus press.

  • Product colour
    • 417/07 Juicer Breakfast Wood:Wood, Beige
    • CJ100HE electric citrus press:Stainless steel
  • Bowl
    • 417/07 Juicer Breakfast Wood:Yes
    • CJ100HE electric citrus press:No
  • Housing material
    • 417/07 Juicer Breakfast Wood:Plastic
    • CJ100HE electric citrus press:Plastic, Metal
  • Power
    • 417/07 Juicer Breakfast Wood:40 W
    • CJ100HE electric citrus press:100 W
  • Width
    • 417/07 Juicer Breakfast Wood:150 mm
    • CJ100HE electric citrus press:165 mm
  • Depth
    • 417/07 Juicer Breakfast Wood:165 mm
    • CJ100HE electric citrus press:210 mm
  • Height
    • 417/07 Juicer Breakfast Wood:255 mm
    • CJ100HE electric citrus press:285 mm
  • Weight
    • 417/07 Juicer Breakfast Wood:750 g
    • CJ100HE electric citrus press:1.9 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 0417/07, CJ100HE
38 specifications
Features3 differ
Product colourDiffersWood, BeigeStainless steel
BowlDiffersYesNo
Bowl capacityKnown for one0.5 LUnknown — not stated by the source
LidYesYes
Non-slip feetKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Cord storageKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of press cones22
Anti-drip functionYesYes
Direct flowKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Double rotation coneKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Dust cover includedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Easy to cleanYesYes
Housing materialDiffersPlasticPlastic, Metal
Juice containerNoNo
Liquid level indicatorKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
On/off switchKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Press leverKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Pulp container capacityKnown for one0 LUnknown — not stated by the source
Push buttonKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Cable lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.1 m
Power1 differ
PowerDiffers40 W100 W
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers150 mm165 mm
DepthDiffers165 mm210 mm
HeightDiffers255 mm285 mm
WeightDiffers750 g1.9 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers155 mm185 mm
Package depthDiffers160 mm254 mm
Package heightDiffers265 mm308 mm
Package weightDiffers1 kg2.4 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one4 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
ManualKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Warranty periodKnown for one2 year(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Products per palletKnown for one160 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Products per intermodal container (20ft)Known for one3544 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Products per intermodal container (40ft)Known for one7088 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Products per intermodal container (40ft, HC)Known for one8612 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for one4.37 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for one4 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More electric citrus press comparisons

All electric citrus press comparisons