Product comparison · 2 electric citrus presses

Ariete 413, Vintage Juicer, Professional Electric Juicer with Lever, 2 Cones for Large and Small Fruits, Anti-Drip Spout, Silent Motor, Professional Squeezing, vs Kenwood CPP 400 TT

11specifications compared
8differ
3identical
28known for one product only

Key differences

The Ariete 413, Vintage Juicer, Professional Electric Juicer with Lever, 2 Cones for Large and Small Fruits, Anti-Drip Spout, Silent Motor, Professional Squeezing, has 35 W more power than the Kenwood CPP 400 TT (85 W vs 50 W). The Ariete 413, Vintage Juicer, Professional Electric Juicer with Lever, 2 Cones for Large and Small Fruits, Anti-Drip Spout, Silent Motor, Professional Squeezing, has 13 mm more width than the Kenwood CPP 400 TT (175 mm vs 162 mm). The Ariete 413, Vintage Juicer, Professional Electric Juicer with Lever, 2 Cones for Large and Small Fruits, Anti-Drip Spout, Silent Motor, Professional Squeezing, has 83 mm more depth than the Kenwood CPP 400 TT (245 mm vs 162 mm). Product colour: Beige on the Ariete 413, Vintage Juicer, Professional Electric Juicer with Lever, 2 Cones for Large and Small Fruits, Anti-Drip Spout, Silent Motor, Professional Squeezing,, Stainless steel on the Kenwood CPP 400 TT. Housing material: Metal on the Ariete 413, Vintage Juicer, Professional Electric Juicer with Lever, 2 Cones for Large and Small Fruits, Anti-Drip Spout, Silent Motor, Professional Squeezing,, Stainless steel on the Kenwood CPP 400 TT.

Product colour
- 413, Vintage Juicer, Professional Electric Juicer with Lever, 2 Cones for Large and Small Fruits, Anti-Drip Spout, Silent Motor, Professional Squeezing,:Beige
- CPP 400 TT:Stainless steel
Housing material
- 413, Vintage Juicer, Professional Electric Juicer with Lever, 2 Cones for Large and Small Fruits, Anti-Drip Spout, Silent Motor, Professional Squeezing,:Metal
- CPP 400 TT:Stainless steel
Power
- 413, Vintage Juicer, Professional Electric Juicer with Lever, 2 Cones for Large and Small Fruits, Anti-Drip Spout, Silent Motor, Professional Squeezing,:85 W
- CPP 400 TT:50 W
Width
- 413, Vintage Juicer, Professional Electric Juicer with Lever, 2 Cones for Large and Small Fruits, Anti-Drip Spout, Silent Motor, Professional Squeezing,:175 mm
- CPP 400 TT:162 mm
Depth
- 413, Vintage Juicer, Professional Electric Juicer with Lever, 2 Cones for Large and Small Fruits, Anti-Drip Spout, Silent Motor, Professional Squeezing,:245 mm
- CPP 400 TT:162 mm
Height
- 413, Vintage Juicer, Professional Electric Juicer with Lever, 2 Cones for Large and Small Fruits, Anti-Drip Spout, Silent Motor, Professional Squeezing,:290 mm
- CPP 400 TT:262 mm
Weight
- 413, Vintage Juicer, Professional Electric Juicer with Lever, 2 Cones for Large and Small Fruits, Anti-Drip Spout, Silent Motor, Professional Squeezing,:1.95 kg
- CPP 400 TT:1.2 kg
Package weight
- 413, Vintage Juicer, Professional Electric Juicer with Lever, 2 Cones for Large and Small Fruits, Anti-Drip Spout, Silent Motor, Professional Squeezing,:3.14 kg
- CPP 400 TT:1.75 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 0413/03, CPP 400 TT
39 specifications	A Ariete 413, Vintage Juicer, Professional Electric Juicer with Lever, 2 Cones for Large and Small Fruits, Anti-Drip Spout, Silent Motor, Professional Squeezing, Model 0413/03 View product	B Kenwood CPP 400 TT View product
Features2 differ
Product colourDiffers	Beige	Stainless steel
BowlKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Bowl capacityKnown for one	0.6 L	Unknown — not stated by the source
LidKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of speedsKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Non-slip feet	Yes	Yes
Cord storageKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of press conesKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Press cone materialKnown for one	Stainless steel	Unknown — not stated by the source
Anti-drip functionKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Double rotation coneKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dust cover includedKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Easy to clean	Yes	Yes
Housing materialDiffers	Metal	Stainless steel
Juice container	No	No
Liquid level indicatorKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
On/off switchKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Press leverKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Pulp container capacityKnown for one	0 L	Unknown — not stated by the source
Push buttonKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Direct flowKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power1 differ
PowerDiffers	85 W	50 W
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	175 mm	162 mm
DepthDiffers	245 mm	162 mm
HeightDiffers	290 mm	262 mm
WeightDiffers	1.95 kg	1.2 kg
Packaging data1 differ
Package weightDiffers	3.14 kg	1.75 kg
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	205 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	205 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	300 mm
Packaging contentidentical
ManualKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Warranty periodKnown for one	2 year(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Products per shipping (inner) caseKnown for one	1 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Products per palletKnown for one	60 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Products per intermodal container (20ft)Known for one	1500 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Products per intermodal container (40ft)Known for one	3020 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Products per intermodal container (40ft, HC)Known for one	3450 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for one	6.72 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for one	2 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More electric citrus press comparisons

All electric citrus press comparisons