Product comparison · 2 dot matrix printers

Fujitsu DL6400 dot matrix printer vs NEC MultiImpact 700JEN

6specifications compared
5differ
1identical
25known for one product only

Key differences

The Fujitsu DL6400 dot matrix printer has 275 W more power consumption (typical) than the NEC MultiImpact 700JEN (360 W vs 85 W). The Fujitsu DL6400 dot matrix printer has 10 - 90% more storage relative humidity (H-H) than the NEC MultiImpact 700JEN (10 - 90% vs 0 - 90%). Maximum resolution: 360 x 360 DPI on the Fujitsu DL6400 dot matrix printer, 160 x 160 DPI on the NEC MultiImpact 700JEN. Standard interfaces: Serial on the Fujitsu DL6400 dot matrix printer, RJ-45, USB 2.0 on the NEC MultiImpact 700JEN. Operating relative humidity (H-H): 30 - 80% on the Fujitsu DL6400 dot matrix printer, 10 - 85% on the NEC MultiImpact 700JEN.

Maximum resolution
- DL6400 dot matrix printer:360 x 360 DPI
- MultiImpact 700JEN:160 x 160 DPI
Standard interfaces
- DL6400 dot matrix printer:Serial
- MultiImpact 700JEN:RJ-45, USB 2.0
Power consumption (typical)
- DL6400 dot matrix printer:360 W
- MultiImpact 700JEN:85 W
Operating relative humidity (H-H)
- DL6400 dot matrix printer:30 - 80%
- MultiImpact 700JEN:10 - 85%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)
- DL6400 dot matrix printer:10 - 90%
- MultiImpact 700JEN:0 - 90%

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of DL6400, MultiImpact 700JEN
31 specifications	A Fujitsu DL6400 dot matrix printer Model DL6400 View product	B NEC MultiImpact 700JEN View product
Printing1 differ
Maximum resolutionDiffers	360 x 360 DPI	160 x 160 DPI
Maximum print speedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	259 cps
Bitmap fontsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	OCR-B
Maximum printing width (columns)Known for one	163	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum number of copiesKnown for one	8 copies	Unknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Grey
Buffer sizeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16 KB
Sound pressure level (printing)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	60 dB
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Standard interfacesDiffers	Serial	RJ-45, USB 2.0
Optional connectivityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Ethernet
Enduranceidentical
Print headKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	24-pin
Print head lifeKnown for one	400 million characters	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ribbon lifeKnown for one	18000 million characters	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one	8000 h	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
AC input frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50 - 60 Hz
AC input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 V
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	12 W
Power consumption (typical)Differs	360 W	85 W
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 38 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-25 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs	30 - 80%	10 - 85%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Differs	10 - 90%	0 - 90%
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	600 mm
DepthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	320 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	297 mm
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	23 kg
Other featuresidentical
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	600 x 300 x 325 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Internal memoryKnown for one	0.128 MB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Fonts includedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for one	ENERGY STAR	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More dot matrix printer comparisons

All dot matrix printer comparisons