Product comparison · 2 dot matrix printers

Epson TM-U220B (007LG): Serial, PS, ECW, EU vs Fujitsu DL6600 dot matrix printer

Add a product
  • 6specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 1identical
  • 26known for one product only

Key differences

The Epson TM-U220B (007LG): Serial, PS, ECW, EU has 180 cps more maximum print speed than the Fujitsu DL6600 dot matrix printer (180 cps vs 0 cps). The Fujitsu DL6600 dot matrix printer has 124 KB more buffer size than the Epson TM-U220B (007LG): Serial, PS, ECW, EU (128 KB vs 4 KB). The Fujitsu DL6600 dot matrix printer has 22.5 kg more weight than the Epson TM-U220B (007LG): Serial, PS, ECW, EU (25 kg vs 2.5 kg). Only the Epson TM-U220B (007LG): Serial, PS, ECW, EU has colour. Dimensions (WxDxH): 160 x 248 x 139 mm on the Epson TM-U220B (007LG): Serial, PS, ECW, EU, 600 x 300 x 325 mm on the Fujitsu DL6600 dot matrix printer.

  • Colour
    • TM-U220B (007LG): Serial, PS, ECW, EU:Yes
    • DL6600 dot matrix printer:No
  • Maximum print speed
    • TM-U220B (007LG): Serial, PS, ECW, EU:180 cps
    • DL6600 dot matrix printer:0 cps
  • Buffer size
    • TM-U220B (007LG): Serial, PS, ECW, EU:4 KB
    • DL6600 dot matrix printer:128 KB
  • Weight
    • TM-U220B (007LG): Serial, PS, ECW, EU:2.5 kg
    • DL6600 dot matrix printer:25 kg
  • Dimensions (WxDxH)
    • TM-U220B (007LG): Serial, PS, ECW, EU:160 x 248 x 139 mm
    • DL6600 dot matrix printer:600 x 300 x 325 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of TM-U220B, DL6600
32 specifications
Printing2 differ
ColourDiffersYesNo
Maximum print speedDiffers180 cps0 cps
Maximum resolutionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source360 x 360 DPI
Features1 differ
Buffer sizeDiffers4 KB128 KB
Country of originKnown for oneChinaUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one31 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers2.5 kg25 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one1 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Package widthKnown for one250 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one400 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one242 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one3.88 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Other features1 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs160 x 248 x 139 mm600 x 300 x 325 mm
Connectivity technologyWiredWired
Media types supportedKnown for oneType AUnknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsKnown for one24 VDCUnknown — not stated by the source
Media thicknessKnown for one0.05 - 0.14 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Standard media sizesKnown for oneType A 76mm x 83mm diameterUnknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one84433210Unknown — not stated by the source
Pallet gross heightKnown for one100 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Pallet gross widthKnown for one120 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Pallet length (UK)Known for one2.25 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Products per palletKnown for one56 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Products per pallet (UK)Known for one84 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Products per pallet layerKnown for one8 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Products per pallet layer (UK)Known for one12 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Enduranceidentical
Print head lifeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source400000000 million characters
Ribbon lifeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source18000000 million characters
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8000 h
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 - 38 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-15 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 - 80%

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More dot matrix printer comparisons

All dot matrix printer comparisons