Product comparison · 2 dot matrix printers

Epson LX-300+II EDG vs NEC PR-D700LE dot matrix printer

Add a product
  • 10specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 2identical
  • 21known for one product only

Key differences

The Epson LX-300+II EDG has 121 cps more maximum print speed than the NEC PR-D700LE dot matrix printer (300 cps vs 179 cps). The Epson LX-300+II EDG has 48 KB more buffer size than the NEC PR-D700LE dot matrix printer (64 KB vs 16 KB). The NEC PR-D700LE dot matrix printer has 11 dB more sound pressure level (printing) than the Epson LX-300+II EDG (60 dB vs 49 dB). Standard interfaces: Parallel, Serial, USB 2.0 on the Epson LX-300+II EDG, RJ-45, USB 2.0 on the NEC PR-D700LE dot matrix printer. AC input voltage: 100 - 240 V on the Epson LX-300+II EDG, 100 V on the NEC PR-D700LE dot matrix printer.

  • Maximum print speed
    • LX-300+II EDG:300 cps
    • PR-D700LE dot matrix printer:179 cps
  • Buffer size
    • LX-300+II EDG:64 KB
    • PR-D700LE dot matrix printer:16 KB
  • Sound pressure level (printing)
    • LX-300+II EDG:49 dB
    • PR-D700LE dot matrix printer:60 dB
  • Standard interfaces
    • LX-300+II EDG:Parallel, Serial, USB 2.0
    • PR-D700LE dot matrix printer:RJ-45, USB 2.0
  • Print head
    • LX-300+II EDG:9-pin
    • PR-D700LE dot matrix printer:24-pin
  • AC input voltage
    • LX-300+II EDG:100 - 240 V
    • PR-D700LE dot matrix printer:100 V
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • LX-300+II EDG:23 W
    • PR-D700LE dot matrix printer:130 W
  • Weight
    • LX-300+II EDG:4.4 kg
    • PR-D700LE dot matrix printer:23 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of LX-300+II EDG, PR-D700LE
31 specifications
Printing1 differ
Maximum resolutionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source160 x 160 DPI
Maximum print speedDiffers300 cps179 cps
Bitmap fontsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceOCR-B
Maximum printing width (columns)Known for one80Unknown — not stated by the source
Character pitchKnown for one10,12,15 cpiUnknown — not stated by the source
Built-in barcodesKnown for oneCODABAR (NW-7), Code 128 (A/B/C), Code 39, EAN13, EAN8, Interleaved 2/5, POSTNET, UPC-A, UPC-EUnknown — not stated by the source
Features2 differ
Product colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceGrey
Buffer sizeDiffers64 KB16 KB
Sound pressure level (printing)Differs49 dB60 dB
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Standard interfacesDiffersParallel, Serial, USB 2.0RJ-45, USB 2.0
Optional connectivityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceEthernet
Endurance1 differ
Print headDiffers9-pin24-pin
Print directionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBidirectional
Power2 differ
AC input voltageDiffers100 - 240 V100 V
Power consumption (standby)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source14 W
Power consumption (typical)Differs23 W130 W
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 - 38 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-25 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 - 85%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 - 90%
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source600 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source320 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source297 mm
WeightDiffers4.4 kg23 kg
Paper handlingidentical
Paper feedKnown for oneManual, Pull tractor, Push tractorUnknown — not stated by the source
Paper tray media typesKnown for oneRollUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one370 x 280 x 160 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Connectivity technologyKnown for oneWiredUnknown — not stated by the source
Print technologyKnown for oneDot matrixUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More dot matrix printer comparisons

All dot matrix printer comparisons