Product comparison · 2 dot matrix printers

Epson LQ-2090II dot matrix printer 550 cps vs Epson LQ-590IIN dot matrix printer 550 cps

Add a product
  • 49specifications compared
  • 17differ
  • 32identical
  • 8known for one product only

Key differences

The Epson LQ-2090II dot matrix printer 550 cps has 56 more maximum printing width (columns) than the Epson LQ-590IIN dot matrix printer 550 cps (136 vs 80). The Epson LQ-2090II dot matrix printer 550 cps has 175 mm more width than the Epson LQ-590IIN dot matrix printer 550 cps (612 mm vs 437 mm). The Epson LQ-2090II dot matrix printer 550 cps has 2.2 kg more weight than the Epson LQ-590IIN dot matrix printer 550 cps (9.4 kg vs 7.2 kg). Paper tray media types: Envelopes on the Epson LQ-2090II dot matrix printer 550 cps, Envelopes, Labels, Roll on the Epson LQ-590IIN dot matrix printer 550 cps. Continuous paper thickness range: 0.12 - 0.46 mm on the Epson LQ-2090II dot matrix printer 550 cps, 0.065 - 0.49 mm on the Epson LQ-590IIN dot matrix printer 550 cps.

  • Maximum printing width (columns)
    • LQ-2090II dot matrix printer 550 cps:136
    • LQ-590IIN dot matrix printer 550 cps:80
  • Paper tray media types
    • LQ-2090II dot matrix printer 550 cps:Envelopes
    • LQ-590IIN dot matrix printer 550 cps:Envelopes, Labels, Roll
  • Continuous paper thickness range
    • LQ-2090II dot matrix printer 550 cps:0.12 - 0.46 mm
    • LQ-590IIN dot matrix printer 550 cps:0.065 - 0.49 mm
  • Standard interfaces
    • LQ-2090II dot matrix printer 550 cps:Parallel, USB 2.0
    • LQ-590IIN dot matrix printer 550 cps:Ethernet, Parallel, USB 2.0
  • Width
    • LQ-2090II dot matrix printer 550 cps:612 mm
    • LQ-590IIN dot matrix printer 550 cps:437 mm
  • Weight
    • LQ-2090II dot matrix printer 550 cps:9.4 kg
    • LQ-590IIN dot matrix printer 550 cps:7.2 kg
  • Package width
    • LQ-2090II dot matrix printer 550 cps:451 mm
    • LQ-590IIN dot matrix printer 550 cps:40 mm
  • Package depth
    • LQ-2090II dot matrix printer 550 cps:735 mm
    • LQ-590IIN dot matrix printer 550 cps:340 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of LQ-2090II, LQ-590IIN
57 specifications
Printing1 differ
ColourNoNo
Maximum printing width (columns)Differs13680
Maximum print speed550 cps550 cps
Character pitch10 cpi10 cpi
Maximum number of copies6 copies6 copies
Built-in barcodesCode 128 (A/B/C), Code 39, EAN13, EAN8, Interleaved 2/5, POSTNET, UPC-A, UPC-ECode 128 (A/B/C), Code 39, EAN13, EAN8, Interleaved 2/5, POSTNET, UPC-A, UPC-E
Character setsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePC437, PC708, PC720, PC850, PC858, PC864, PCAR864, ISO 8859-15, Roman 8, Italic
Print speedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUltra Speed-Draft: 10 cpi: 550 chars/s
Paper handling2 differ
Paper tray media typesDiffersEnvelopesEnvelopes, Labels, Roll
Continuous paper thickness rangeDiffers0.12 - 0.46 mm0.065 - 0.49 mm
Label thickness range0.16 - 0.19 mm0.16 - 0.19 mm
Multi-part paper thickness range0.12 - 0.46 mm0.12 - 0.46 mm
Single sheet thickness range0.065 - 0.14 mm0.065 - 0.14 mm
Featuresidentical
Product colourBlackBlack
Buffer size128 KB128 KB
Sound pressure level (printing)55 dB55 dB
Country of originIndonesiaIndonesia
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Standard interfacesDiffersParallel, USB 2.0Ethernet, Parallel, USB 2.0
Enduranceidentical
Print head24-pin24-pin
Print head life400 million characters400 million characters
Mean time between failures (MTBF)25000 h25000 h
Poweridentical
Power consumption (economy mode)Known for one49 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (standby)Known for one49 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Known for one49 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)5 - 35 °C5 - 35 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)10 - 80%10 - 80%
System requirements1 differ
Mac compatibilityKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Server operating systems supportedDiffersWindows Server 2003 x64, Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows Server 2016Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows Server 2016
Windows operating systems supportedWindows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows Vista, Windows XPWindows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows Vista, Windows XP
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WidthDiffers612 mm437 mm
Depth375 mm375 mm
Height177 mm177 mm
WeightDiffers9.4 kg7.2 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Quantity per pack1 pc(s)1 pc(s)
Package widthDiffers451 mm40 mm
Package depthDiffers735 mm340 mm
Package heightDiffers295 mm80 mm
Package weightDiffers12.2 kg9.28 kg
Other features2 differ
Print technologyDot matrixDot matrix
Compatible operating systemsDiffersWindows 10, Windows 7, Windows 7, 64-Bit-Version, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows 8.1 x64 Edition, Windows Server 2003 x64, Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows Server 2016, Windows Vista, Windows Vista, 64-Bit-Version, Windows XP, Windows XP Professional x64 Edition SP2 or laterWindows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows 8.1 x64 Edition, Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows Server 2016, Windows Vista, Windows XP
NeedlesDiffers2424 Needles
Connectivity technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWired
Standard media sizesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSheet Paper (single- and multi-layer), Continuous Paper (single- and multi-layer), Labels (single- and multi-layer), Roll Paper, Envelopes, Cardboard
Technical detailsidentical
Sustainability certificatesENERGY STARENERGY STAR
Logistics data4 differ
Harmonized System (HS) code8443321084433210
Pallet gross heightDiffers4.59 m7.43 m
Pallet gross length120 cm120 cm
Pallet gross weight0 g0 g
Pallet gross width80 cm80 cm
Pallet height (UK)Differs4.59 m7.43 m
Pallet length (UK)120 cm120 cm
Pallet weight (UK)0 g0 g
Pallet width (UK)100 cm100 cm
Products per pallet14 pc(s)14 pc(s)
Products per pallet (UK)Differs21 pc(s)28 pc(s)
Products per pallet layer2 pc(s)2 pc(s)
Products per pallet layer (UK)Differs3 pc(s)4 pc(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More dot matrix printer comparisons

All dot matrix printer comparisons