All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 dot matrix printers

Epson LQ-1310 dot matrix printer 416 cps vs Epson PLQ -20DM

Add a product
  • 9specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 5identical
  • 33known for one product only

Key differences

The Epson PLQ -20DM has 64 cps more maximum print speed than the Epson LQ-1310 dot matrix printer 416 cps (480 cps vs 416 cps). Character pitch: 10,12,15 cpi on the Epson LQ-1310 dot matrix printer 416 cps, 10,12 cpi on the Epson PLQ -20DM. Page description languages: Epson ESC/P2, PPDS on the Epson LQ-1310 dot matrix printer 416 cps, Epson ESC/P2 on the Epson PLQ -20DM. Standard interfaces: Parallel, Serial, USB on the Epson LQ-1310 dot matrix printer 416 cps, Serial, USB 2.0 on the Epson PLQ -20DM.

  • Maximum print speed
    • 416 cps
    • 480 cps
  • Character pitch
    • 10,12,15 cpi
    • 10,12 cpi
  • Page description languages
    • Epson ESC/P2, PPDS
    • Epson ESC/P2
  • Standard interfaces
    • Parallel, Serial, USB
    • Serial, USB 2.0

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
42 specifications
A

Epson

LQ-1310 dot matrix printer 416 cps

Model LQ-1310

View product
B

Epson

PLQ -20DMView product
Printing2 differ
Maximum resolutionKnown for one240 x 360 DPI
Maximum printing width (columns)Known for one94
Maximum print speedDiffers416 cps480 cps
Maximum print speed (draft)Known for one432 cps
Maximum print speed (LQ)Known for one144 cps
Character pitchDiffers10,12,15 cpi10,12 cpi
Built-in barcodesKnown for oneCODABAR (NW-7), EAN13, EAN8, Industrial 2/5, Interleaved 2/5, POSTNET, UPC-A
ColourKnown for oneNo
Bitmap fontsKnown for oneCourier, Draft, Orator, Orator-S, Prestige, Roman, Sans Serif, Script, Script C
Scalable fontsKnown for oneRoman, Roman T, Sans Serif, Sans Serif H
Character setsKnown for oneASCII, Abicomp, BRASCII, ISO 8859-15, ISO Latin 1, PC437, PC850, PC858, PC860, PC861, PC863, PC865, Roman 8
Paper handlingidentical
Maximum print sizeKnown for oneA4 / Letter (216 x 297 mm)
Paper tray media typesKnown for oneCut sheet
Cut sheet media weightKnown for one52 - 157 g/m²
Cut sheet thickness rangeKnown for one0.065 - 0.19 mm
Features1 differ
Buffer size128 KB128 KB
Sound pressure level (printing)Known for one55 dB
Page description languagesDiffersEpson ESC/P2, PPDSEpson ESC/P2
Country of originKnown for oneIndonesia
Product colourKnown for oneBlack, White
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Standard interfacesDiffersParallel, Serial, USBSerial, USB 2.0
Cabling technologyKnown for one10/100Base-T(X)
Optional connectivityKnown for oneEthernet, Wireless LAN
Enduranceidentical
Print head24-pin24-pin
Print directionBidirectionalBidirectional
Print head life400 million characters400 million characters
Ribbon lifeKnown for one10 million characters
Mean time between failures (MTBF)10000 h10000 h
Poweridentical
AC input voltageKnown for one220 - 240 V
Power consumption (standby)Known for one7.5 W
Power consumption (typical)Known for one60 W
AC input frequencyKnown for one50 - 60 Hz
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for one7.7 kg
Other featuresidentical
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one384 x 280 x 203 mm
Connectivity technologyKnown for oneWired
Network readyKnown for oneYes
Print technologyKnown for oneDot matrix
Media thicknessKnown for one2.6 mm
Weight (imperial)Known for one7.71 kg (17 lbs)
Technical detailsidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for oneENERGY STAR
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one5 - 35 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one10 - 80%

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More dot matrix printer comparisons

All dot matrix printer comparisons