Product comparison · 2 dot matrix printers

Epson C31C514667 dot matrix printer vs Epson FX-2190N

3specifications compared
3differ
0identical
32known for one product only

Key differences

The Epson C31C514667 dot matrix printer has 160,000 h more mean time between failures (MTBF) than the Epson FX-2190N (180000 h vs 20000 h). The Epson FX-2190N has 6.9 kg more weight than the Epson C31C514667 dot matrix printer (9.4 kg vs 2.5 kg). Dimensions (WxDxH): 160 x 248 x 138.5 mm on the Epson C31C514667 dot matrix printer, 589 x 350 x 167.5 mm on the Epson FX-2190N.

Mean time between failures (MTBF)
- C31C514667 dot matrix printer:180000 h
- FX-2190N:20000 h
Weight
- C31C514667 dot matrix printer:2.5 kg
- FX-2190N:9.4 kg
Dimensions (WxDxH)
- C31C514667 dot matrix printer:160 x 248 x 138.5 mm
- FX-2190N:589 x 350 x 167.5 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of C31C514667, FX-2190N
35 specifications	A Epson C31C514667 dot matrix printer Model C31C514667 View product	B Epson FX-2190N Model FX-2190N View product
Printingidentical
ColourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Maximum print speedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	680 cps
Maximum number of copiesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	7 copies
Built-in barcodesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Code 39, POSTNET, UPC-A, UPC-E
Character densityKnown for one	16 cpi	Unknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
Buffer sizeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	128 KB
Sound pressure level (printing)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	55 dB
Country of originKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Indonesia
Product colourKnown for one	Grey	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Standard interfacesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB 1.1
Endurance1 differ
Print directionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Bidirectional
Ribbon lifeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	12 million characters
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Differs	180000 h	20000 h
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	2.5 kg	9.4 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 pc(s)
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	460 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	700 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	270 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	11.8 kg
Other features1 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	160 x 248 x 138.5 mm	589 x 350 x 167.5 mm
Power requirementsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	240 V
Fonts includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Epson Draft, Epson Roman, Epson Sans Serif
Paper handlingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CSF
Connectivity technologyKnown for one	Wired	Unknown — not stated by the source
Print technologyKnown for one	Dot matrix	Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Pallet gross heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 cm
Pallet gross widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	120 cm
Pallet length (UK)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.04 m
Products per palletKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	14 pc(s)
Products per pallet (UK)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	21 pc(s)
Products per pallet layerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2 pc(s)
Products per pallet layer (UK)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3 pc(s)
Operational conditionsidentical
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	-10 - 50 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	10 - 90%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	10 - 90%	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More dot matrix printer comparisons

All dot matrix printer comparisons